This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Natao arisiva ity resaka mitohy ity. Mametraha fanontaniana azafady raha mila fanampiana.

Subject column shows [EXTERNAL] but the subject line on the email does not

  • 2 valiny
  • 1 manana an'ity olana ity
  • 10 views
  • Valiny farany nomen'i mfb11

mfb11
mfb11
more options

I have a Macro in MS Outlook that strips the prepended [EXTERNAL] warning from the subject line. In Outlook the warning is gone. I use Exquilla to have Thunderbird access our Exchange server and also use Davmail for the same purpose. Thunderbird shows [EXTERNAL] in the Subject column when viewing these emails as a group in the InBox, but the individual Subject Line does not show [EXTERNAl]. When I view the source for these emails from which [EXTERNAL] has been stripped, I cannot find [EXTERNAL]. It is as if Thunderbird is reading an [EXTERNAL] flag on Exchange, because that [EXTERNAL] text is not really in the email.

When I import the emails from Exchange to a local POP Thunderbird account, these [EXTERNAL] warnings remain. If they are not in the source of the email, they must be some type of retained flag. How do I remove this prepended [EXTERNAL] warning that I now only see in Thunderbird?

I have a Macro in MS Outlook that strips the prepended [EXTERNAL] warning from the subject line. In Outlook the warning is gone. I use Exquilla to have Thunderbird access our Exchange server and also use Davmail for the same purpose. Thunderbird shows [EXTERNAL] in the Subject column when viewing these emails as a group in the InBox, but the individual Subject Line does not show [EXTERNAl]. When I view the source for these emails from which [EXTERNAL] has been stripped, I cannot find [EXTERNAL]. It is as if Thunderbird is reading an [EXTERNAL] flag on Exchange, because that [EXTERNAL] text is not really in the email. When I import the emails from Exchange to a local POP Thunderbird account, these [EXTERNAL] warnings remain. If they are not in the source of the email, they must be some type of retained flag. How do I remove this prepended [EXTERNAL] warning that I now only see in Thunderbird?

All Replies (2)

Matt
Matt
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

try right clicking the folder, selecting properties and then repair. My guess is the list index is just not getting updated when the filter does it's thing.

mfb11
mfb11 Tompon'ny fanontaniana
more options

Matt-- It is confusing. Thunderbird still shows [External] in the Subject Column (but not the Subject Line) in Exchange emails in which the Outlook macro stripped the [External] prepend from the subject line. Even after repairing the folder, Thunderbird shows [External] in emails on the Exchange server that Outlook shows no "[External]". The macro runs in Outlook before the email ever makes it to Thunderbird. And the source code for the email shows no [EXTERNAL].

I can't figure out what Thunderbird is seeing (through Exquilla and Davmail).

But you are correct. When I move an email from the Exchange Server to the POP account, it initially shows [EXTERNAL] in the subject column, and not in the individual subject line. Then when I repair the folder, [EXTERNAL] disappears from the subject column.

It seems like the Outlook Macro is not deleting [External] from the Outlook subject line, it is hiding it. The Subject Column sees the hidden "[External]", the subject line does not. Then when you move the message from the Exchange Server to the POP account, the "[External]" really gets deleted, so a repair of the folder gets rid of it from the Subject column as well.

Is there a technical basis for any of this conjecture?