This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Èròjà atẹ̀lélànà yii ni a ti fi pamọ́ fọ́jọ́ pípẹ́. Jọ̀wọ́ béèrè ìbéèrè titun bí o bá nílò ìrànwọ́.

How can I stop Thunderbird from sending emails to spam?

  • 6 àwọn èsì
  • 13 ní àwọn ìṣòro yìí
  • 15 views
  • Èsì tí ó kẹ́hìn lọ́wọ́ Staticide

more options

I work as a consultant and use Thunderbird as my business email. Over the past month, emails from one of my clients have been going to spam. I have added their addresses to my address book. On the Junk Setting menu, "Do not automatically mark mail as junk if the sender is in:" I selected both "collected addresses" and "personal address book." Several times I have marked the emails as "not junk." Still, the emails continue to go to the spam box. Now, Thunderbird has started sending mails from other senders with that domain name to junk too. How can I fix this? It is not only frustrating but is impacting my ability to run my business. Thank you!

I work as a consultant and use Thunderbird as my business email. Over the past month, emails from one of my clients have been going to spam. I have added their addresses to my address book. On the Junk Setting menu, "Do not automatically mark mail as junk if the sender is in:" I selected both "collected addresses" and "personal address book." Several times I have marked the emails as "not junk." Still, the emails continue to go to the spam box. Now, Thunderbird has started sending mails from other senders with that domain name to junk too. How can I fix this? It is not only frustrating but is impacting my ability to run my business. Thank you!

Ọ̀nà àbáyọ tí a yàn

Well you are more than likely using IMAP email and seeing the folder created by your provider. As stated before Thunderbird does not use the word spam for anything.

Ka ìdáhùn ni ìṣètò kíkà 👍 2

All Replies (6)

more options

Thunderbird does not use the word spam or move messages to a spam folder. That is why they use the word junk but still get blamed for this action. I suggest you look at your providers spam filtering or an spam component of your antivirus software.

more options

Well, there is actually a folder called "spam" in Thunderbird, and that is where these emails are ending up. I have also tried to address this problem directly with my provider, but to no avail. I will try contacting their helpline.

Ti ṣàtúnṣe nípa michelle900

more options

Ọ̀nà àbáyọ Tí a Yàn

Well you are more than likely using IMAP email and seeing the folder created by your provider. As stated before Thunderbird does not use the word spam for anything.

more options

Airmail said

Well you are more than likely using IMAP email and seeing the folder created by your provider. As stated before Thunderbird does not use the word spam for anything.
For about 5 years, I've received daily emails from a well-known online vitamin retailer often containing discount coupons. and other useful info. For about the past month, the emails arrive at my inbox with "*** SPAM***" in the subject line preceding the retailer's own subject. If T-Bird never uses the word "Spam" for anything, who do you suppose is adding this to the subject line? Don't try to tell me the retailer is adding it.
more options

Your email provider, your antivirus software or any other Spam software you might have on your computer. None of which is covered by this forum.

Thunderbird does not do it.

If you need further help please start your own thread. The people involved with this SOLVED thread do not want to be notified about your issue.

more options

My apologies. Perhaps if there hadn't been a large "I Have This Problem Too" button to click below the posts, I wouldn't have been induced to question your assertion.