This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Hierdie gesprek is in die argief. Vra asseblief 'n nuwe vraag as jy hulp nodig het.

Button height not working in v95.0?

  • 1 antwoord
  • 1 het hierdie probleem
  • 2 views
  • Laaste antwoord deur CharlesEF

more options

Hi All,

What is the secret to getting a button height percentage to work in a table td? This code works fine in my Chromium browser but not FireFox v95.0 on Win10 Pro:

<td class="day date">

 <button type="button" style="height: 75%; width: 75%;">1</button>

</td>

The width seems to work but not height. Only the table element has a height of 100%. Since this is a calendar app I prefer not to set height for tr and td, if possible.

Is there any way to get this to work otherwise?


Thanks for any help,

Charles

Hi All, What is the secret to getting a button height percentage to work in a table td? This code works fine in my Chromium browser but not FireFox v95.0 on Win10 Pro: <td class="day date"> <button type="button" style="height: 75%; width: 75%;">1</button> </td> The width seems to work but not height. Only the table element has a height of 100%. Since this is a calendar app I prefer not to set height for tr and td, if possible. Is there any way to get this to work otherwise? Thanks for any help, Charles

All Replies (1)

more options

I think I found a solution for my problem. At least Firefox and my Chromium browsers look the same. I had to give my table tr's and td's a height after all. However, I found a height of 10% was all that was needed.

Unless someone suggests something better I will consider my problem solved.


Thank you,

Charles