This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

ابحث في الدعم

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Need an older ESR

  • 4 ردود
  • 0 have this problem
  • 15 views
  • آخر ردّ كتبه Terry

more options

How do I download 68.10 ESR? Later versions break my files. Don't know why and can not get newer files. All I get is newest version, not the one I need. I can get to the older version directory. But which file do I get?????????

How do I download 68.10 ESR? Later versions break my files. Don't know why and can not get newer files. All I get is newest version, not the one I need. I can get to the older version directory. But which file do I get?????????

All Replies (4)

more options

Should be able to get it from here: https://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/firefox/releases/68.10.0esr/

If you're running 64bit Windows and need the English language version, then https://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/firefox/releases/68.10.0esr/win64/en-US/ is probably what you need.

They have pretty much every version they ever did there.

Mark H.

more options

Modified by Terry

more options

Terry; Oh flooy. Just found the file. It was hidden in plain site:)


That gets me the latest version. I have an install of that but need another install no later that 68.10 ESR, 68.11 ESR breaks the sidebar on my files. I know it is a software problem, but the author is dead:( And beside I have over 500 such files. Upgraded to 68.12 ESR and all went kaplooy:( Went looking and I didn't have a backup of the installer:( So I am using 68.0 ESR, all I had. BTW 10.14.6 and can't upgrade this machine for reasons. But that wouldn't fix this scenario. TCC:}

more options

See the reply by MarkRH.