Този сайт ще има ограничена функционалност, докато се извършва тече неговата поддръжка. Ако дадена статия не може реши проблема ви и искате да зададете въпрос, нашата общност е готова да ви помогне на @firefox в Twitter и /r/firefox в Reddit.

Търсене в помощните статии

Избягвайте измамите при поддръжката. Никога няма да ви помолим да се обадите или изпратите SMS на телефонен номер или да споделите лична информация. Моля, докладвайте подозрителна активност на "Докладване за злоупотреба".

Научете повече

Thunderbird's "maximum number of server connections to cache" is not working!?

  • 3 отговора
  • 1 има този проблем
  • 5 изгледи
  • Последен отговор от Gigi_diVine

more options

Recently I was experiencing some slowness with emails so I login into my hosting (Siteground) and to my horror I noticed the "running processes" was way over the limit. On Thunderbird I have the "maximum number of server connections to cache" to 1 and all was running smooth until a few days ago. Now I have multiple connections. Is there a new bug on thunderbird? What can I do? HELP!

Recently I was experiencing some slowness with emails so I login into my hosting (Siteground) and to my horror I noticed the "running processes" was way over the limit. On Thunderbird I have the "maximum number of server connections to cache" to 1 and all was running smooth until a few days ago. Now I have multiple connections. Is there a new bug on thunderbird? What can I do? HELP!

Всички отговори (3)

more options

These are the settings I've had and haven't had a problem with the hosting or server until now, Thunderbird is creating multiple connections to the server.

more options

Is this on a Mac? They are notorious for opening multiple connections and hogging all the bandwidth. :-(

more options

Yes is Mac, but it has been working fine since May until now with the settings I mentioned above, and it was always just one connection per email, now I count 10 per email! Is totally out of control >_<

I first thought it was the new update from TB but I checked on my other computer using 31.7 and it's the same problem.