Този сайт ще има ограничена функционалност, докато се извършва тече неговата поддръжка. Ако дадена статия не може реши проблема ви и искате да зададете въпрос, нашата общност е готова да ви помогне на @firefox в Twitter и /r/firefox в Reddit.

Търсене в помощните статии

Избягвайте измамите при поддръжката. Никога няма да ви помолим да се обадите или изпратите SMS на телефонен номер или да споделите лична информация. Моля, докладвайте подозрителна активност на "Докладване за злоупотреба".

Научете повече

Mozilla Firefox Disables "Multirow Bookmark Toolbar" Customization (Userchrome.css) in Firefox 67 Beta 4

  • 2 отговора
  • 1 има този проблем
  • 23 изгледи
  • Последен отговор от tempest21

more options

Mozilla? Major FAIL! The one thing that worked for me was the ability to customize a userchrome.css so that I could get the multirow toolbar to work through a customized "userchrome.css" file. CONGRATS (spoken with sarcasm) on releasing a new version of Firefox that completely ignores the userchrome.css file.

My current userchrome.css files looks like this:

/* Multi-Row Bookmarks Toolbar */

  1. PersonalToolbar {

/* Provide room for up to 4 rows at 26px */ max-height: 115px !important; }

  1. PlacesToolbarItems > box {

display: inline-block !important; }

  1. PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems {

/* Override hiding */ overflow-x: visible !important; overflow-y: visible !important; /* Add a little cushion */ padding-bottom: 1px; }

  1. PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems .bookmark-item {

/* Reduce padding on individual bookmarks to fit rows closer together */ padding-top: 1px !important; padding-bottom: 1px !important; } .tabbrowser-tab::before, .tabbrowser-tab::after{

 display: none !important;

} toolbarbutton.bookmark-item {

font-size:13px !important;

}

It no longer works as Firefox 67 completely ignores the file. If anyone has a suggestion, I'm all ears. Otherwise, I'll be dumping Firefox (after being a user for some 15+ years and switching to another web browser. Mozilla keeps removing vital functions of Firefox to make it less user friendly then it was before.

Mozilla? Major FAIL! The one thing that worked for me was the ability to customize a userchrome.css so that I could get the multirow toolbar to work through a customized "userchrome.css" file. CONGRATS (spoken with sarcasm) on releasing a new version of Firefox that completely ignores the userchrome.css file. My current userchrome.css files looks like this: /* Multi-Row Bookmarks Toolbar */ #PersonalToolbar { /* Provide room for up to 4 rows at 26px */ max-height: 115px !important; } #PlacesToolbarItems > box { display: inline-block !important; } #PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems { /* Override hiding */ overflow-x: visible !important; overflow-y: visible !important; /* Add a little cushion */ padding-bottom: 1px; } #PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems .bookmark-item { /* Reduce padding on individual bookmarks to fit rows closer together */ padding-top: 1px !important; padding-bottom: 1px !important; } .tabbrowser-tab::before, .tabbrowser-tab::after{ display: none !important; } toolbarbutton.bookmark-item { font-size:13px !important; } It no longer works as Firefox 67 completely ignores the file. If anyone has a suggestion, I'm all ears. Otherwise, I'll be dumping Firefox (after being a user for some 15+ years and switching to another web browser. Mozilla keeps removing vital functions of Firefox to make it less user friendly then it was before.

Всички отговори (2)

more options

This didn't affect you when you were using Firefox 66? There was a structural change to the bar and it's easy to find new style recipes now. For example:

https://www.reddit.com/r/FirefoxCSS/comments/b346fz/firefox_66_destroyed_my_more_toolbars_fix/

https://www.userchrome.org/what-is-userchrome-css.html#multirowbookmarks

more options

It really didn't when I upgraded to Firefox 66. Don't know why. But thanks for posting that link. It worked perfectly. There are certain links that I have in my toolbar and it's become an important feature of Firefox for me. Thanks for the reference link.