This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

【Feature Request】Consider adding "SM4”

more options

For more: SM2 by ISO SM2 by ISO.

Advantages in brief:

1. Much less size (fixed size to 256 bits) only, compared with RSA (2048 or 4096 bits) and ECC (128-512 bits).

2. Much faster, compared with RSA in decryption/encryption, a little faster than ECC.

3. With encryption/decryption functions/key changing with each other.

4. Free to the public.

5. Safe in use.

For more: [https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cuiling-dnsop-sm2-alg-14.html SM2 by ISO] SM2 by ISO. Advantages in brief: 1. Much less size (fixed size to 256 bits) only, compared with RSA (2048 or 4096 bits) and ECC (128-512 bits). 2. Much faster, compared with RSA in decryption/encryption, a little faster than ECC. 3. With encryption/decryption functions/key changing with each other. 4. Free to the public. 5. Safe in use.

All Replies (1)

more options

Where to change the topic? In fact, SM2/3/4/9 are passed by ISO and the other related orgs.

Helpful?

Ask a question

You must log in to your account to reply to posts. Please start a new question, if you do not have an account yet.