Dette websted vil have begrænset funktionalitet, mens vi gennemgår vedligeholdelse for at forbedre din oplevelse. Hvis en artikel ikke løser dit problem, og du vil stille et spørgsmål, har vi vores supportfællesskab, der venter på at hjælpe dig på @FirefoxSupport på Twitter og/r/firefox på Reddit.

Søg i Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Læs mere

How to fix display bug for .svg images

  • 2 svar
  • 1 har dette problem
  • 5 visninger
  • Seneste svar af cor-el

more options

I am in big trouble.

I have a website where I use .svg for illustrating my articles. The problem is that most illustrations do not display properly on Firefox (see attached images here: https://imgur.com/a/nEPF79y/ ). They display correctly on all browsers except Firefox...

For example, I have some issues with this file: https://salarship.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/wear-job-interview-fast-food.svg that you can see implemented in the article: https://salarship.com/article/dress-fast-food-job-interview/

Is there any fix for this? Is it a problem with the file itself or the implementation on my website?

Best, Nathan

I am in big trouble. I have a website where I use .svg for illustrating my articles. The problem is that most illustrations do not display properly on Firefox (see attached images here: https://imgur.com/a/nEPF79y/ ). They display correctly on all browsers except Firefox... For example, I have some issues with this file: https://salarship.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/wear-job-interview-fast-food.svg that you can see implemented in the article: https://salarship.com/article/dress-fast-food-job-interview/ Is there any fix for this? Is it a problem with the file itself or the implementation on my website? Best, Nathan

Alle svar (2)

more options

That blue bar is this element within the SVG (as determined by right-click > Inspect Element on the stand-alone SVG page):

<path class="cls-107" d="m 553.78,288.31 c 0,-0.13 0,-0.24 0,-0.35 0,-0.11 0,-0.14 0,-0.19 a 0.54,0.54 0 0 1 0,-0.1 0.19,0.19 0 0 0 0,-0.08 0.31,0.31 0 0 1 0,-0.08 v -0.07 0 0 0 0 c 0,0 0,0 0,0 v 0 0 0 h -0.05 v 0 h -0.17 v 0 0 l -33.54,23.73 v 0 a 0.38,0.38 0 0 1 0.19,-0.06 v 0 a 0.22,0.22 0 0 1 0.17,0.08 v 0 0 0 0 0 c 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 v 0 a 0.25,0.25 0 0 0 0,0.07 0.19,0.19 0 0 1 0,0.07 8.510071e11,8.510071e11 0 0 1 0,0.18 c 0,0.06 0,0.13 0.05,0.2 0.05,0.07 0,0.22 0,0.35 0.34,3.29 -0.81,13 -2.91,23.87 -2.21,11.46 -4.72,20.27 -6,21.15 l 33.22,-19.42 c 1.22,-0.87 4,-14 6.27,-25.46 1.99,-10.87 3.11,-20.59 2.77,-23.89 z" id="path3700"/>

I don't know why it would be less visible in other browsers. Must be a different interpretation of one of those parameters I don't understand.

more options

If I hide that element via "opacity:0" then it looks better.