Die Funktionalität dieser Website ist durch Wartungsarbeiten eingeschränkt, die Ihr Erlebnis verbessern sollen. Wenn ein Artikel Ihr Problem nicht löst und Sie eine Frage stellen möchten, können Sie unsere Gemeinschaft über @FirefoxSupport auf Twitter, /r/firefox oder Reddit fragen.

Avatar for Username

Hilfe durchsuchen

Vorsicht vor Support-Betrug: Wir fordern Sie niemals auf, eine Telefonnummer anzurufen, eine SMS an eine Telefonnummer zu senden oder persönliche Daten preiszugeben. Bitte melden Sie verdächtige Aktivitäten über die Funktion „Missbrauch melden“.

Weitere Informationen

Dieses Thema wurde archiviert. Bitte stellen Sie eine neue Frage, wenn Sie Hilfe benötigen.

Profiles loaded via profile manager slow to load pages

  • 7 Antworten
  • 4 haben dieses Problem
  • 5 Aufrufe
  • Letzte Antwort von Wilbird

Wilbird
Wilbird
more options

Hi, Since version 58.0.2 (64 bits) of Firefox under Windows 10, the profiles I open via the profile manager ("...\firefox.exe" -no-remote -p) are very slow to load web pages. Not every pages appear to be affected, but all Google services for example are very long to open, showing the message "A web page is slowing down your browser, what do you want to do, wait or stop it". On the other side, when open without the profile manager (this time via "...\firefox.exe"), each profile works normally : the loading speed of the web pages is correct.

I tried to create desktop shortcuts to each profile as a work around, but this opens a second instance of the already open profile and not the one targeted by the shortcut (zumaxb described the same problem here : https://support.mozilla.org/fr/questions/1205523#question-reply ).

Thanks for your help.

Hi, Since version 58.0.2 (64 bits) of Firefox under Windows 10, the profiles I open via the profile manager ("...\firefox.exe" -no-remote -p) are very slow to load web pages. Not every pages appear to be affected, but all Google services for example are very long to open, showing the message "A web page is slowing down your browser, what do you want to do, wait or stop it". On the other side, when open without the profile manager (this time via "...\firefox.exe"), each profile works normally : the loading speed of the web pages is correct. I tried to create desktop shortcuts to each profile as a work around, but this opens a second instance of the already open profile and not the one targeted by the shortcut (zumaxb described the same problem here : https://support.mozilla.org/fr/questions/1205523#question-reply ). Thanks for your help.

Ausgewählte Lösung

It appears Avast was the culprit : the profile manager doesn't slow anymore web pages after Avast uninstallation. Problem solved by switching to another antivirus, which was a project I was considering anyway. Thanks for your help.

Diese Antwort im Kontext lesen 👍 0

Alle Antworten (7)

cor-el
cor-el
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

Did you include the -no-remote switch in the target line of the desktop shortcuts?

See also:

Wilbird
Wilbird Fragesteller
more options

No, I actually forgot it. Thanks, the shortcuts work correctly now. What about the problem with the profile manager ? Is it a bug un version 58.0.2 ?

philipp
philipp
  • Moderator
more options

are you happening to use avast/avg security software?

Wilbird
Wilbird Fragesteller
more options

I'm using Avast and I did some testing by disabling it, but that did not solve the problem.

philipp
philipp
  • Moderator
more options

does it make any difference if you disable script scanning in the avast webshield and reboot your system once? if not try to uninstall it altogether once...

Wilbird
Wilbird Fragesteller
more options

No difference with all Avast agents disabled, even after a reboot. Uninstall it seems a bit radical but I will try tomorrow.

Wilbird
Wilbird Fragesteller
more options

Ausgewählte Lösung

It appears Avast was the culprit : the profile manager doesn't slow anymore web pages after Avast uninstallation. Problem solved by switching to another antivirus, which was a project I was considering anyway. Thanks for your help.