Funkcionalnosć toś togo sedła se pśez wótwardowańske źěła wobgranicujo, kótarež maju wašo dožywjenje pólěpšyś. Jolic nastawk waš problem njerozwězujo a cośo pšašanje stajiś, wobrośćo se na našo zgromoźeństwo pomocy, kótarež na to caka, wam na @FirefoxSupport na Twitter a /r/firefox na Reddit pomagaś.

Pomoc pśepytaś

Glědajśo se wobšudy pomocy. Njenapominajomy was nigda, telefonowy numer zawołaś, SMS pósłaś abo wósobinske informacije pśeraźiś. Pšosym dajśo suspektnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužywanje k wěsći daś“ k wěsći.

Dalšne informacije

Red broken lock on http sites tells users there is an error when nothing is wrong.

  • 4 wótegrona
  • 2 matej toś ten problem
  • 2 naglěda
  • Slědne wótegrono wót George

more options

I maintain about 50 websites and I'm now getting complaints from customers who think their sites are suddenly insecure. Sites that don't collect personal information and don't have any login form. The use of the color red means "error" to people. It should really show a neutral color, or maybe a clear lock. If everyone continues to see a red broken lock on all http sites the symbol will become meaningless and ignored by most users. Or were you expecting all sites to suddenly install SSL certificates even when there is no need?

I'm referring to version 50.0.1.

I maintain about 50 websites and I'm now getting complaints from customers who think their sites are suddenly insecure. Sites that don't collect personal information and don't have any login form. The use of the color red means "error" to people. It should really show a neutral color, or maybe a clear lock. If everyone continues to see a red broken lock on all http sites the symbol will become meaningless and ignored by most users. Or were you expecting all sites to suddenly install SSL certificates even when there is no need? I'm referring to version 50.0.1.

Wšykne wótegrona (4)

more options

hello, could you please provide a sample of a page without a login form that displays the broken secure site indicator?

more options
more options
more options

This was the article that alarmed me. Was it inaccurate? http://tech.firstpost.com/news-analysis/google-chrome-and-mozilla-firefox-will-now-mark-unencrypted-connections-as-not-secure-359598.html

Note that it also has a broken lock.

Wót George změnjony