Funkcionalnosć toś togo sedła se pśez wótwardowańske źěła wobgranicujo, kótarež maju wašo dožywjenje pólěpšyś. Jolic nastawk waš problem njerozwězujo a cośo pšašanje stajiś, wobrośćo se na našo zgromoźeństwo pomocy, kótarež na to caka, wam na @FirefoxSupport na Twitter a /r/firefox na Reddit pomagaś.

Avatar for Username

Pomoc pśepytaś

Glědajśo se wobšudy pomocy. Njenapominajomy was nigda, telefonowy numer zawołaś, SMS pósłaś abo wósobinske informacije pśeraźiś. Pšosym dajśo suspektnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužywanje k wěsći daś“ k wěsći.

Dalšne informacije

Toś ta nitka jo se archiwěrowała. Pšosym stajśo nowe pšašanje, joli trjebaśo pomoc.

Why is my sent to recipient labeled UNDISCLOSED?

  • 3 wótegrona
  • 2 matej toś ten problem
  • 3 naglědy
  • Slědne wótegrono wót car-nuts

spaceraven
spaceraven
more options

I sent an email for an address in my book with a copy to myself. The email I received had this recipient marked as Undisclosed. When I checked so did the sent email. Even though I am the author I cannot it appears Unmasked this recipient. What occurred and can I unmask to verify who got it?

I sent an email for an address in my book with a copy to myself. The email I received had this recipient marked as Undisclosed. When I checked so did the sent email. Even though I am the author I cannot it appears Unmasked this recipient. What occurred and can I unmask to verify who got it?

Wubrane rozwězanje

Actually close. Think I figured it out. Apparently when there is No Recipient and only a BCC or maybe a CC, Thunderbird plugs in that false Undisclosed Recipient as a default. Not really an accurate default imo. The clue is that it was so identified on my sent message, not just the copy I got back. Thanks

Toś to wótegrono w konteksće cytaś 👍 0

Wšykne wótegrona (3)

Zenos
Zenos
more options

That sounds rather like what should happen if you had set both addressees to use "Bcc:". Do you think that is possible?

If you're using gmail, then you won't see the Bcc'd addresses in your Sent folder either. Google choose to redact them.

spaceraven
spaceraven Pšašaŕ
more options

Wubrane rozwězanje

Actually close. Think I figured it out. Apparently when there is No Recipient and only a BCC or maybe a CC, Thunderbird plugs in that false Undisclosed Recipient as a default. Not really an accurate default imo. The clue is that it was so identified on my sent message, not just the copy I got back. Thanks

car-nuts
car-nuts
more options

In my case I found this issue was related to double entries in the sent file, Haven't solved it yet: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1183704