Funkcionalnosć toś togo sedła se pśez wótwardowańske źěła wobgranicujo, kótarež maju wašo dožywjenje pólěpšyś. Jolic nastawk waš problem njerozwězujo a cośo pšašanje stajiś, wobrośćo se na našo zgromoźeństwo pomocy, kótarež na to caka, wam na @FirefoxSupport na Twitter a /r/firefox na Reddit pomagaś.

Avatar for Username

Pomoc pśepytaś

Glědajśo se wobšudy pomocy. Njenapominajomy was nigda, telefonowy numer zawołaś, SMS pósłaś abo wósobinske informacije pśeraźiś. Pšosym dajśo suspektnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužywanje k wěsći daś“ k wěsći.

Dalšne informacije

Toś ta nitka jo se archiwěrowała. Pšosym stajśo nowe pšašanje, joli trjebaśo pomoc.

Sec-WebSocket-Protocol in websocket handshake response

  • 1 wótegrono
  • 1 ma toś ten problem
  • 2 naglěda
  • Slědne wótegrono wót Gerd

manlm1
manlm1
more options

In Chrome when I make a websocket handshake, if in the request, the "Sec-WebSocket-Protocol" header is specified, then the response from server must also has this header, if not, chrome will not allow to make the connection But in Firefox, the response does not need to have the header. Why Firefox allow this?

Regards, ManLM

In Chrome when I make a websocket handshake, if in the request, the "Sec-WebSocket-Protocol" header is specified, then the response from server must also has this header, if not, chrome will not allow to make the connection But in Firefox, the response does not need to have the header. Why Firefox allow this? Regards, ManLM

Wšykne wótegrona (1)

Gerd
Gerd
more options

It is possible that this is a non-standard header (that is therefor not implemented in FF), or that Firefox' security policies are not as strict.

Most likely this shouldn't cause any problems.