Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Funkcionalnosć toś togo sedła se pśez wótwardowańske źěła wobgranicujo, kótarež maju wašo dožywjenje pólěpšyś. Jolic nastawk waš problem njerozwězujo a cośo pšašanje stajiś, wobrośćo se na našo zgromoźeństwo pomocy, kótarež na to caka, wam na @FirefoxSupport na Twitter a /r/firefox na Reddit pomagaś.

Pomoc pśepytaś

Glědajśo se wobšudy pomocy. Njenapominajomy was nigda, telefonowy numer zawołaś, SMS pósłaś abo wósobinske informacije pśeraźiś. Pšosym dajśo suspektnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužywanje k wěsći daś“ k wěsći.

Dalšne informacije

Firefox on terminal server

  • 1 wótegrono
  • 1 ma toś ten problem
  • 4 naglědy
  • Slědne wótegrono wót Mike Kaply

more options

I need to install Firefox on some terminal servers I'm setting up, and am wondering which is the best version for this - should I just use the standard release and let it auto-update, or would I be best using the ESR release to avoid potential problems with the automatic updates. Has anyone got experience of this?

It's probably not important, but the terminal servers are running Windows Server 2016

Thanks

I need to install Firefox on some terminal servers I'm setting up, and am wondering which is the best version for this - should I just use the standard release and let it auto-update, or would I be best using the ESR release to avoid potential problems with the automatic updates. Has anyone got experience of this? It's probably not important, but the terminal servers are running Windows Server 2016 Thanks

Wót DavidYorkshire změnjony

Wšykne wótegrona (1)

more options

This sounds like a good usecase for ESR. There are still update every six weeks, but they are less intrusive.