This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Wo archive tread sia. Meɖekuku bia biabia yeye ne ehia kpeɖeŋu.

Have all the hash values been included in hash table for Firefox v46.0?

  • 1 ŋuɖoɖo
  • 1 masɔmasɔ sia le esi
  • 7 views
  • Nuɖoɖo mlɔetɔ philipp

yelsker
yelsker
more options

First, thanks for all the work so many of you do to produce Firefox. It's a terrific application and we've been using it for years. It's far and away our first choice for browsers- excellent job!

So my question is this: Have all the hash values been included in the table: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/SHA512SUMS ?

Having computed the SHA512 hash for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/win64/en-US/Firefox Setup 46.0.exe reveals no matching hash in the above-mentioned table, although computing a hash for, as an example for:

https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/mac/en-US/Firefox 46.0.dmg DOES find a corresponding match in the table.

For comparison, I checked the raw size of: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.2/ -> File SHA512SUMS 517K 12-Apr-2016 14:08

and for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/ -> File SHA512SUMS 186K 26-Apr-2016 21:18 so there seems to be a large discrepancy in the file sizes.

If there are missing hash values in the v46.0 hash table, could that table be updated to include the missing values so that the user community can properly verify the correct download of the v46.0 files?

Thanks again for all the work the community does!

First, thanks for all the work so many of you do to produce Firefox. It's a terrific application and we've been using it for years. It's far and away our first choice for browsers- excellent job! So my question is this: Have all the hash values been included in the table: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/SHA512SUMS ? Having computed the SHA512 hash for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/win64/en-US/Firefox Setup 46.0.exe reveals no matching hash in the above-mentioned table, although computing a hash for, as an example for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/mac/en-US/Firefox 46.0.dmg DOES find a corresponding match in the table. For comparison, I checked the raw size of: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.2/ -> File SHA512SUMS 517K 12-Apr-2016 14:08 and for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/ -> File SHA512SUMS 186K 26-Apr-2016 21:18 so there seems to be a large discrepancy in the file sizes. If there are missing hash values in the v46.0 hash table, could that table be updated to include the missing values so that the user community can properly verify the correct download of the v46.0 files? Thanks again for all the work the community does!

All Replies (1)

philipp
philipp
  • Moderator
more options

hi yelsker, please refer to https://rail.merail.ca/posts/firefox-460-and-sha512sums.html