Ce site disposera de fonctionnalités limitées pendant que nous effectuons des opérations de maintenance en vue de vous proposer un meilleur service. Si un article ne règle pas votre problème et que vous souhaitez poser une question, notre communauté d’assistance est prête à vous répondre via @FirefoxSupport sur Twitter, et /r/firefox sur Reddit.

Rechercher dans l’assistance

Évitez les escroqueries à l’assistance. Nous ne vous demanderons jamais d’appeler ou d’envoyer un SMS à un numéro de téléphone ou de partager des informations personnelles. Veuillez signaler toute activité suspecte en utilisant l’option « Signaler un abus ».

En savoir plus

Firefox 60.9.0 ESR remaining after newer version silent install

  • 1 réponse
  • 1 a ce problème
  • 27 vues
  • Dernière réponse par m30guy

more options

Attempting to patch a corporate template (reason why the version is so old) and when using any later ESR installer with the -ms parameters the old version remains.

The installer returns a 0 exit code when done through our scripting. However it never actually installs.

Being ESR there are no logs.

When you manually install everything goes fine. The scripting handles elevating permissions, we use the same functionality across the enterprise so we know this should not be the issue.

However, and this is the odd part, if we "inject" a new installer in our scripting it will install if done without any other actions. However, for production support we have many other third party app updates.

I was leaning towards app conflicts (maybe handle locks on required libs etc) but after much testing, there are no conflicts.

I am at a loss. Any thoughts?

Attempting to patch a corporate template (reason why the version is so old) and when using any later ESR installer with the -ms parameters the old version remains. The installer returns a 0 exit code when done through our scripting. However it never actually installs. Being ESR there are no logs. When you manually install everything goes fine. The scripting handles elevating permissions, we use the same functionality across the enterprise so we know this should not be the issue. However, and this is the odd part, if we "inject" a new installer in our scripting it will install if done without any other actions. However, for production support we have many other third party app updates. I was leaning towards app conflicts (maybe handle locks on required libs etc) but after much testing, there are no conflicts. I am at a loss. Any thoughts?

Toutes les réponses (1)

more options

Forgot to mention this is on Windows Server 2012 R2 x64 (yes I know using servers as client platforms is wonky)