Om de ûnderfining foar jo te ferbetterjen is tydlik de funksjonaliteit dan dizze website troch ûnderhâldswurk beheind. Wannear in artikel jo probleem net oplost en jo in fraach stelle wolle, kin ús stipemienskip jo helpe yn @FirefoxSupport op Twitter en /r/firefox op Reddit.

Sykje yn Support

Mij stipescams. Wy sille jo nea freegje in telefoannûmer te beljen, der in sms nei ta te stjoeren of persoanlike gegevens te dielen. Meld fertochte aktiviteit mei de opsje ‘Misbrûk melde’.

Mear ynfo

Dizze konversaasje is argivearre. Stel in nije fraach as jo help nedich hawwe.

What is the actual exact order of the cipher suites offered by firefox client when making ssl/tls handshake?

  • 2 antwurd
  • 1 hat dit probleem
  • 10 werjeftes
  • Lêste antwurd fan emmy786

more options

When I click about:config and type 'security.ssl3.' in the search box, I got the list of cipher suites that firefox supports ordered alphabetically. In SSL protocol, the client send the supported cipher suites to the server. In some cases, the order of these ciphers in the client make difference on the choice of the server. I need to know what is the exact actual order that firefox client presents to SSL server? Tanks.

When I click about:config and type 'security.ssl3.' in the search box, I got the list of cipher suites that firefox supports ordered alphabetically. In SSL protocol, the client send the supported cipher suites to the server. In some cases, the order of these ciphers in the client make difference on the choice of the server. I need to know what is the exact actual order that firefox client presents to SSL server? Tanks.

Alle antwurden (2)

more options
more options

Thanks. I viewed the code. I am trying to understand. I found a list of ciphersuites starting from line 84. Here is what is says: /* Deprecated SSL 3.0 & libssl names replaced by IANA-registered TLS names. */ 85 #ifndef SSL_DISABLE_DEPRECATED_CIPHER_SUITE_NAMES 86 #define SSL_NULL_WITH_NULL_NULL TLS_NULL_WITH_NULL_NULL . .

Ok, what I understand is that firefox offers no authentication no encryption (no security) as first option, if the server accept this, it will choose it? Because the first NULL means no authentication, the second NULL means no encryption, and the third means no Hash function.

am I right in my interpretation?

If you have a definite answer of what order does firefox client offers to ssl/tls server, please, provide me with accurate answer. I am not sure of my own interpretation for the code.