Om de ûnderfining foar jo te ferbetterjen is tydlik de funksjonaliteit dan dizze website troch ûnderhâldswurk beheind. Wannear in artikel jo probleem net oplost en jo in fraach stelle wolle, kin ús stipemienskip jo helpe yn @FirefoxSupport op Twitter en /r/firefox op Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Sykje yn Support

Mij stipescams. Wy sille jo nea freegje in telefoannûmer te beljen, der in sms nei ta te stjoeren of persoanlike gegevens te dielen. Meld fertochte aktiviteit mei de opsje ‘Misbrûk melde’.

Mear ynfo

Dizze konversaasje is argivearre. Stel in nije fraach as jo help nedich hawwe.

Have all the hash values been included in hash table for Firefox v46.0?

  • 1 antwurd
  • 1 hat dit probleem
  • 7 werjeftes
  • Lêste antwurd fan philipp

yelsker
yelsker
more options

First, thanks for all the work so many of you do to produce Firefox. It's a terrific application and we've been using it for years. It's far and away our first choice for browsers- excellent job!

So my question is this: Have all the hash values been included in the table: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/SHA512SUMS ?

Having computed the SHA512 hash for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/win64/en-US/Firefox Setup 46.0.exe reveals no matching hash in the above-mentioned table, although computing a hash for, as an example for:

https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/mac/en-US/Firefox 46.0.dmg DOES find a corresponding match in the table.

For comparison, I checked the raw size of: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.2/ -> File SHA512SUMS 517K 12-Apr-2016 14:08

and for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/ -> File SHA512SUMS 186K 26-Apr-2016 21:18 so there seems to be a large discrepancy in the file sizes.

If there are missing hash values in the v46.0 hash table, could that table be updated to include the missing values so that the user community can properly verify the correct download of the v46.0 files?

Thanks again for all the work the community does!

First, thanks for all the work so many of you do to produce Firefox. It's a terrific application and we've been using it for years. It's far and away our first choice for browsers- excellent job! So my question is this: Have all the hash values been included in the table: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/SHA512SUMS ? Having computed the SHA512 hash for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/win64/en-US/Firefox Setup 46.0.exe reveals no matching hash in the above-mentioned table, although computing a hash for, as an example for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/mac/en-US/Firefox 46.0.dmg DOES find a corresponding match in the table. For comparison, I checked the raw size of: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.2/ -> File SHA512SUMS 517K 12-Apr-2016 14:08 and for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/ -> File SHA512SUMS 186K 26-Apr-2016 21:18 so there seems to be a large discrepancy in the file sizes. If there are missing hash values in the v46.0 hash table, could that table be updated to include the missing values so that the user community can properly verify the correct download of the v46.0 files? Thanks again for all the work the community does!

Alle antwurden (1)

philipp
philipp
  • Moderator
more options

hi yelsker, please refer to https://rail.merail.ca/posts/firefox-460-and-sha512sums.html