Om de ûnderfining foar jo te ferbetterjen is tydlik de funksjonaliteit dan dizze website troch ûnderhâldswurk beheind. Wannear in artikel jo probleem net oplost en jo in fraach stelle wolle, kin ús stipemienskip jo helpe yn @FirefoxSupport op Twitter en /r/firefox op Reddit.

Sykje yn Support

Mij stipescams. Wy sille jo nea freegje in telefoannûmer te beljen, der in sms nei ta te stjoeren of persoanlike gegevens te dielen. Meld fertochte aktiviteit mei de opsje ‘Misbrûk melde’.

Mear ynfo

Dizze konversaasje is argivearre. Stel in nije fraach as jo help nedich hawwe.

Transferred size is bigger than size in inspection mode

more options

If you go here https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/new/desktop There is a gif file with dimension of 1x1 has the size of 35 B and transfer size of 459 B. Why is transfer size bigger than size? Even this happen as I am writing this support question lol. This thing always appear even on other website so you might want to check stuff out while in the wild. I have seen questions like this in SO. The comment says it is a bug and fixed in version 52 like a year ago. So whats up with transfer size?

If you go here https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/new/desktop There is a gif file with dimension of 1x1 has the size of 35 B and transfer size of 459 B. Why is transfer size bigger than size? Even this happen as I am writing this support question lol. This thing always appear even on other website so you might want to check stuff out while in the wild. I have seen questions like this in SO. The comment says it is a bug and fixed in version 52 like a year ago. So whats up with transfer size?

Alle antwurden (4)

more options

Can you account for the difference by looking at the length of the headers?

For example, this empty text file

https://www.userchrome.org/samples/userChrome.css

Network Monitor tool reports

  • Transferred: 409 bytes
  • Size: 0 bytes

If I count the characters in the Response Headers (raw), it's 381, plus 12 for line breaks, making 393.

I don't know where the discrepancy is. Maybe a gzip thing.

more options

By the way, the Dev Tools team has a forum over here if you really want to dig into it:

https://discourse.mozilla.org/c/devtools

more options

I will find more examples. I once during my web dev testing got an image (not empty) with larger transfer size. Also some html and javascript with larger transfer size

more options

lordsacha said

I will find more examples. I once during my web dev testing got an image (not empty) with larger transfer size. Also some html and javascript with larger transfer size

That makes sense: images in web formats are generally do not compress much more than an empty file, so when you account for overhead, the transferred size will be a bit larger than the image file. HTML, on the other hand, should compress well.