Om de ûnderfining foar jo te ferbetterjen is tydlik de funksjonaliteit dan dizze website troch ûnderhâldswurk beheind. Wannear in artikel jo probleem net oplost en jo in fraach stelle wolle, kin ús stipemienskip jo helpe yn @FirefoxSupport op Twitter en /r/firefox op Reddit.

Sykje yn Support

Mij stipescams. Wy sille jo nea freegje in telefoannûmer te beljen, der in sms nei ta te stjoeren of persoanlike gegevens te dielen. Meld fertochte aktiviteit mei de opsje ‘Misbrûk melde’.

Mear ynfo

Dizze konversaasje is argivearre. Stel in nije fraach as jo help nedich hawwe.

Does userContent.css require a header? knowledge base doesn't say

  • 2 antwurd
  • 1 hat dit probleem
  • 3 werjeftes
  • Lêste antwurd fan cor-el

more options

Hi,

Since many User Styles aren't working, I'm using userChrome.css, and I'm trying to use userContent.css. It's not working.

http://kb.mozillazine.org/index.php?title=UserContent.css&printable=yes doesn't explain how to write userContent.css to get it to work. It asks people to download a zip file instead of explaining how to write the thing.

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Editing_configuration/Manual_editing doesn't explain it either

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Editing_configuration/Troubleshooting doesn't explain it either

If it does require a header, what is that header? I've used the same header as for userChrome:

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);

Hi, Since many User Styles aren't working, I'm using userChrome.css, and I'm trying to use userContent.css. It's not working. http://kb.mozillazine.org/index.php?title=UserContent.css&printable=yes doesn't explain how to write userContent.css to get it to work. It asks people to download a zip file instead of explaining how to write the thing. http://kb.mozillazine.org/Editing_configuration/Manual_editing doesn't explain it either http://kb.mozillazine.org/Editing_configuration/Troubleshooting doesn't explain it either If it does require a header, what is that header? I've used the same header as for userChrome: @namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);

Alle antwurden (2)

more options

Don't use the "XUL" header in userContent.css -- XUL is a language used only in the user interface.

(I don't use it in userChrome.css either, but it's slightly controversial. https://www.userchrome.org/adding-style-recipes-userchrome-css....)

You can optionally use an HTML namespace header in userContent.css, but it shouldn't make any difference. There must be some other issue.

  • Name -- as with userChrome.css, the file name of userContent.css must match exactly
  • Location -- same chrome folder as userChrome.css

Now, as for the specific user styles, if they don't work in Stylus perhaps they just don't work??

The only reason to use a userContent.css file instead of Stylus, in my opinion, is to modify internal Firefox pages like the Add-ons page or new tab page. For regular web pages, it's easier to use Stylus.

more options

userChrome.css is for making changes to the Firefox user interface. For some (html namespace) elements you sometimes need to override the default XUL name space (*|<element>). userContent.css is for styling web pages and doesn't need a @namespace header or it would be the default HTML namespace.

@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);

Both files support @-moz-document rules to limit the rules to a specific domain or URL.