Ko tenda hembiapoite sa’ivéta oñemba’apokuévo hese hembiapo porãve hag̃ua. Peteĩ jehaipyre nomoĩporãiramo ne apañuái ha eporanduséramo, roguerekohína ore nepytyvõ rekoha ikatútava ndeykeko @FirefoxSupport Twitter-pe ha avei /r/firefox Reddit-pe.

Avatar for Username

Eheka Pytyvõha

Emboyke pytyvõha apovai. Ndorojeruremo’ãi ehenói térã eñe’ẽmondóvo pumbyrýpe ha emoherakuãvo marandu nemba’etéva. Emombe’u tembiapo imarãkuaáva ko “Marandu iñañáva” rupive.

Kuaave

Ko téma oñeñongatúma. Ejapo porandu pyahu eikotevẽramo pytyvõ.

Sec-WebSocket-Protocol in websocket handshake response

  • 1 Mbohovái
  • 1 oguereko ko apañuái
  • 2 Hecha
  • Mbohovái ipaháva Gerd

manlm1
manlm1
more options

In Chrome when I make a websocket handshake, if in the request, the "Sec-WebSocket-Protocol" header is specified, then the response from server must also has this header, if not, chrome will not allow to make the connection But in Firefox, the response does not need to have the header. Why Firefox allow this?

Regards, ManLM

In Chrome when I make a websocket handshake, if in the request, the "Sec-WebSocket-Protocol" header is specified, then the response from server must also has this header, if not, chrome will not allow to make the connection But in Firefox, the response does not need to have the header. Why Firefox allow this? Regards, ManLM

Opaite Mbohovái (1)

Gerd
Gerd
more options

It is possible that this is a non-standard header (that is therefor not implemented in FF), or that Firefox' security policies are not as strict.

Most likely this shouldn't cause any problems.