Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Ovo će web mjesto raditi na ograničen način, dok obavljamo održavanje stranice. Ako neki članak ne riješi tvoj problem i ako želiš postaviti pitanje, naša zajednica za podršku spremna je pomoći na Twitteru @FirefoxSupport i na Redditu /r/firefox.

Avatar for Username

Pretraži podršku

Izbjegni prevare podrške. Nikad te nećemo tražiti da nas nazoveš, da nam pošalješ telefonski broj ili da podijeliš osobne podatke. Prijavi sumnjive radnje pomoću opcije „Prijavi zlouporabu”.

Saznaj više

Ova tema je arhivirana. Postavi novo pitanje ako trebaš pomoć.

Wondering if 65.0.1 has a memory leak? Had no issues with previous version. Memory seems to creep up and max out eventually.

  • 2 odgovora
  • 0 ima ovaj problem
  • 20 prikaza
  • Posljednji odgovor od Pj

aeridyne
aeridyne
more options

Had no issues with previous version that I'm aware of. After reboot & update recently seems I have a problem.

My usage habit is basically I've usually got hundreds of tabs up on a few different windows up to sometimes 10. Memory seems to creep up with browsing and doesn't really seem to go down even if I close a large number of tabs or whole windows now. A while back there was another version that would leak but it got fixed (within the quantum releases not the really old memory leak that was super bad.) Just wondering if maybe this version has a leak as well.

Side note: I DO love the crash recovery, because it works better than anything else. If I try to close all windows and then relaunch and restore session it never seems to recover everything. But if I crash it via task manager on purpose it has near 100% ability to restore. I'd rather not have to do it that way but it's what works. I'm a very heavy user and outside the norm a bit.

Had no issues with previous version that I'm aware of. After reboot & update recently seems I have a problem. My usage habit is basically I've usually got hundreds of tabs up on a few different windows up to sometimes 10. Memory seems to creep up with browsing and doesn't really seem to go down even if I close a large number of tabs or whole windows now. A while back there was another version that would leak but it got fixed (within the quantum releases not the really old memory leak that was super bad.) Just wondering if maybe this version has a leak as well. Side note: I DO love the crash recovery, because it works better than anything else. If I try to close all windows and then relaunch and restore session it never seems to recover everything. But if I crash it via task manager on purpose it has near 100% ability to restore. I'd rather not have to do it that way but it's what works. I'm a very heavy user and outside the norm a bit.

Svi odgovori (2)

FredMcD
FredMcD
more options

Start Firefox in Safe Mode {web link}

A small dialog should appear. Click Start In Safe Mode (not Refresh). Is the problem still there?


https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firefox+is+already+running+but+is+not+responding

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-slow-how-make-it-faster

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-uses-too-many-cpu-resources-how-fix

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-uses-too-much-memory-ram

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-hangs-or-not-responding

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-takes-long-time-start-up

Pj
Pj
more options

aeridyne said

Wondering if 65.0.1 has a memory leak? Had no issues with previous version. Memory seems to creep up and max out eventually.

No issues with the previous version? I wish I had that kind of performance. I've always had 'Memory Creep' from IE and through FF versions of past and current. (I just DL'd FF 65.0.2, so it'll be running next time I restart this session.)

However, I do have 21 windows and over 1,200 Total Tabs at the moment, so maybe FF is fine after all. I just got reduce my many Tabs and browser windows. (Sigh)


~Pj