Ovo će web mjesto raditi na ograničen način, dok obavljamo održavanje stranice. Ako neki članak ne riješi tvoj problem i ako želiš postaviti pitanje, naša zajednica za podršku spremna je pomoći na Twitteru @FirefoxSupport i na Redditu /r/firefox.

Pretraži podršku

Izbjegni prevare podrške. Nikad te nećemo tražiti da nas nazoveš, da nam pošalješ telefonski broj ili da podijeliš osobne podatke. Prijavi sumnjive radnje pomoću opcije „Prijavi zlouporabu”.

Saznaj više

junk controls & IMAP keywords

  • 2 odgovora
  • 1 ima ovaj problem
  • 1 prikaz
  • Posljednji odgovor od Morgan

more options

Does TB add the ‘junk’ and ‘nonjunk’ keywords to email on IMAP servers (which support keywords) when determining email as junk (or not) and moving it to the spam folder (or not) whatever that happens to be named?

Does TB add the ‘junk’ and ‘nonjunk’ keywords to email on IMAP servers (which support keywords) when determining email as junk (or not) and moving it to the spam folder (or not) whatever that happens to be named?

Izabrano rješenje

I believe it does. There was a bug a few years ago about Thunderbird not using the IMAP spam tagging or whatever and it was an issue with yahoo and that was fixed.

Pročitaj ovaj odgovor u kontekstu 👍 1

Svi odgovori (2)

more options

Odabrano rješenje

I believe it does. There was a bug a few years ago about Thunderbird not using the IMAP spam tagging or whatever and it was an issue with yahoo and that was fixed.

more options

Many thanks - now I know where the tags (or at least some of them) are coming from - it seems peculiar that TB is using 'nonjunk' instead of 'notjunk' as defined here: https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-jmap-keywords/imap-jmap-keywords.xhtml But, there does seem some confusion between the two, see here: https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-jmap-keywords/notjunk/notjunk-template ['... set or clear $NonJunk at any time.']