Ovo će web mjesto raditi na ograničen način, dok obavljamo održavanje stranice. Ako neki članak ne riješi tvoj problem i ako želiš postaviti pitanje, naša zajednica za podršku spremna je pomoći na Twitteru @FirefoxSupport i na Redditu /r/firefox.

Pretraži podršku

Izbjegni prevare podrške. Nikad te nećemo tražiti da nas nazoveš, da nam pošalješ telefonski broj ili da podijeliš osobne podatke. Prijavi sumnjive radnje pomoću opcije „Prijavi zlouporabu”.

Saznaj više

Thunderbird has over 3000 open file descripters

more options

I'm not sure if Thunderbird is my problem or not, but I'm getting problems where gnome-shell will not open new windows because there are too many files open. So I'm trying to count the files I have open with each process, and I'm noticing that Thunderbird has 3400 files open.

(I'm measuring this using `lsof -p <PID> | wc -l`, so the ouput of lsof has 3400 lines.)

I'm confused as to why so many open files; is something not getting closed after it is read?

I'm running Thunderbird 91.11.0 on Pop_OS 22.04

I'm not sure if Thunderbird is my problem or not, but I'm getting problems where gnome-shell will not open new windows because there are too many files open. So I'm trying to count the files I have open with each process, and I'm noticing that Thunderbird has 3400 files open. (I'm measuring this using `lsof -p <PID> | wc -l`, so the ouput of lsof has 3400 lines.) I'm confused as to why so many open files; is something not getting closed after it is read? I'm running Thunderbird 91.11.0 on Pop_OS 22.04

Svi odgovori (2)

more options

I rebooted my machine, and rechecked for open file descriptors.

With thunderbird simply running minimized, there are initially 631 open files. After just a few minutes there are 681.

As I'm typing this message, it has dropped down to 619.

Not sure how it is growing so large.

more options

One more data point to add to the confusion. The number of open files has jumped up to 3468. This was after the OWL extension ran to fetch mail from the exchange server. Maybe the leak is there.