Ovo će web mjesto raditi na ograničen način, dok obavljamo održavanje stranice. Ako neki članak ne riješi tvoj problem i ako želiš postaviti pitanje, naša zajednica za podršku spremna je pomoći na Twitteru @FirefoxSupport i na Redditu /r/firefox.

Pretraži podršku

Izbjegni prevare podrške. Nikad te nećemo tražiti da nas nazoveš, da nam pošalješ telefonski broj ili da podijeliš osobne podatke. Prijavi sumnjive radnje pomoću opcije „Prijavi zlouporabu”.

Saznaj više

【Feature Request】Consider adding "SM4”

more options

For more: SM2 by ISO SM2 by ISO.

Advantages in brief:

1. Much less size (fixed size to 256 bits) only, compared with RSA (2048 or 4096 bits) and ECC (128-512 bits).

2. Much faster, compared with RSA in decryption/encryption, a little faster than ECC.

3. With encryption/decryption functions/key changing with each other.

4. Free to the public.

5. Safe in use.

For more: [https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cuiling-dnsop-sm2-alg-14.html SM2 by ISO] SM2 by ISO. Advantages in brief: 1. Much less size (fixed size to 256 bits) only, compared with RSA (2048 or 4096 bits) and ECC (128-512 bits). 2. Much faster, compared with RSA in decryption/encryption, a little faster than ECC. 3. With encryption/decryption functions/key changing with each other. 4. Free to the public. 5. Safe in use.

Svi odgovori (1)

more options

Where to change the topic? In fact, SM2/3/4/9 are passed by ISO and the other related orgs.

Korisno?

Postavi pitanje

You must log in to your account to reply to posts. Please start a new question, if you do not have an account yet.