We're calling on all EU-based Mozillians with iOS or iPadOS devices to help us monitor Apple’s new browser choice screens. Join the effort to hold Big Tech to account!

Funkcionalnosć tutoho sydła so přez wothladowanske dźěła wobmjezuje, kotrež maja waše dožiwjenje polěpšić. Jeli nastawk waš problem njerozrisuje a chceće prašenje stajić, wobroćće so na naše zhromodźenstwo pomocy, kotrež na to čaka, wam na @FirefoxSupport na Twitter a /r/firefox na Reddit pomhać.

Avatar for Username

Pomoc přepytać

Hladajće so wobšudstwa pomocy. Njenamołwimy was ženje, telefonowe čisło zawołać, SMS pósłać abo wosobinske informacije přeradźić. Prošu zdźělće podhladnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužiwanje zdźělić“.

Dalše informacije

Tuta nitka je so archiwowała. Prošu stajće nowe prašenje, jeli pomoc trjebaće.

Shockwave Player shown as vulnerable but updated 3X & Flash Player up to date.

  • 1 wotmołwa
  • 2 matej tutón problem
  • 3 napohlady
  • Poslednja wotmołwa wot teeter

teeter
teeter
more options

Plugin Status loaded in Firefox. It showed both Adobe Flash Player and Adobe Shockwave Player as vulnerable. Updating Adobe Flasy Player to Shockwave Flash 22.0.0.292 seemed to work and show it uptodate but Adobe Shockwave Player remained vulnerable. I keep going to the link to update Adobe Shockwave Player, but after I do I still get the vulnerable designation (after refreshing). I have tried to uninstall and reinstall. I have restarted Firefox, although it doesn't say I need to. I'm wondering if this is a problem that Adobe changed the name. Or that the two are synonymous now. Martha Teeter

Plugin Status loaded in Firefox. It showed both Adobe Flash Player and Adobe Shockwave Player as vulnerable. Updating Adobe Flasy Player to Shockwave Flash 22.0.0.292 seemed to work and show it uptodate but Adobe Shockwave Player remained vulnerable. I keep going to the link to update Adobe Shockwave Player, but after I do I still get the vulnerable designation (after refreshing). I have tried to uninstall and reinstall. I have restarted Firefox, although it doesn't say I need to. I'm wondering if this is a problem that Adobe changed the name. Or that the two are synonymous now. Martha Teeter
Připowěsnjene fota wobrazowki

Wšě wotmołwy (1)

teeter
teeter Prašer
more options

I meant 22.0.0.192. Well in looking for support, I refreshed Firefox. And now the problem seems to have disappeared. No vulnerable Adobe Shockwave Flash.