Funkcionalnosć tutoho sydła so přez wothladowanske dźěła wobmjezuje, kotrež maja waše dožiwjenje polěpšić. Jeli nastawk waš problem njerozrisuje a chceće prašenje stajić, wobroćće so na naše zhromodźenstwo pomocy, kotrež na to čaka, wam na @FirefoxSupport na Twitter a /r/firefox na Reddit pomhać.

Avatar for Username

Pomoc přepytać

Hladajće so wobšudstwa pomocy. Njenamołwimy was ženje, telefonowe čisło zawołać, SMS pósłać abo wosobinske informacije přeradźić. Prošu zdźělće podhladnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužiwanje zdźělić“.

Dalše informacije

Tuta nitka je so archiwowała. Prošu stajće nowe prašenje, jeli pomoc trjebaće.

Breaking security ad ons in Firefox

  • 1 wotmołwa
  • 1 ma tutón problem
  • 1 napohlad
  • Poslednja wotmołwa wot Happy112

tonson
tonson
more options

I have seen that Mozilla is breaking my security ad ons from EFF an F-secure by calling them legacy and no longer supporting them, while they are important for the security of browsing the web. I noticed that by accident and I don't like that you break important security parts of the browser without notifying and without giving these security organizations the time to roll out a new version that will not be blocked by you. I very often install Firefox on laptops or phones of friends as I tell them that Firefox is secure. But breaking important security ad ons is not te right way to attract more people to use Firefox. Why you did so, why you did it in this way anf how are you going to solve this?

I have seen that Mozilla is breaking my security ad ons from EFF an F-secure by calling them legacy and no longer supporting them, while they are important for the security of browsing the web. I noticed that by accident and I don't like that you break important security parts of the browser without notifying and without giving these security organizations the time to roll out a new version that will not be blocked by you. I very often install Firefox on laptops or phones of friends as I tell them that Firefox is secure. But breaking important security ad ons is not te right way to attract more people to use Firefox. Why you did so, why you did it in this way anf how are you going to solve this?

Wubrane rozrisanje

Firefox has multiple security settings and has regular security updates;
you're pretty safe using Firefox on the web. Plus : there is Windows' built-in Defender.

The security add-ons that you are talking about : It is up to the developers to keep their add-ons updated and migrate them to Webextensions. You should contact the developer(s) of those add-ons and ask them to update.

Tutu wotmołwu w konteksće čitać 👍 0

Wšě wotmołwy (1)

Happy112
Happy112
more options

Wubrane rozrisanje

Firefox has multiple security settings and has regular security updates;
you're pretty safe using Firefox on the web. Plus : there is Windows' built-in Defender.

The security add-ons that you are talking about : It is up to the developers to keep their add-ons updated and migrate them to Webextensions. You should contact the developer(s) of those add-ons and ask them to update.