Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Funkcionalnosć tutoho sydła so přez wothladowanske dźěła wobmjezuje, kotrež maja waše dožiwjenje polěpšić. Jeli nastawk waš problem njerozrisuje a chceće prašenje stajić, wobroćće so na naše zhromodźenstwo pomocy, kotrež na to čaka, wam na @FirefoxSupport na Twitter a /r/firefox na Reddit pomhać.

Avatar for Username

Pomoc přepytać

Hladajće so wobšudstwa pomocy. Njenamołwimy was ženje, telefonowe čisło zawołać, SMS pósłać abo wosobinske informacije přeradźić. Prošu zdźělće podhladnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužiwanje zdźělić“.

Dalše informacije

Tuta nitka je so archiwowała. Prošu stajće nowe prašenje, jeli pomoc trjebaće.

How does Firefox determine the Firefox GPOs are in place, superceding policies.json?

  • 4 wotmołwy
  • 1 ma tutón problem
  • 1 napohlad
  • Poslednja wotmołwa wot cor-el

davwan
davwan
more options

Within our environment, we've got a bunch of very old GPOs. However, we do not have the Firefox policy templates imported or enabled. With a customized Firefox deployment that includes both autoconfig and policies.json, settings and policies apply fine on a test system that's off the domain, but within the domain, it's almost as if the policies.json are ignored altogether.

How does Firefox determine to supercede the policies.json file? Does it simply look for active GPOs with Firefox in the name, and if so, skip applying policies by json?

Within our environment, we've got a bunch of very old GPOs. However, we do not have the Firefox policy templates imported or enabled. With a customized Firefox deployment that includes both autoconfig and policies.json, settings and policies apply fine on a test system that's off the domain, but within the domain, it's almost as if the policies.json are ignored altogether. How does Firefox determine to supercede the policies.json file? Does it simply look for active GPOs with Firefox in the name, and if so, skip applying policies by json?

Wubrane rozrisanje

cor-el said

Did you look for a X:\Windows\PolicyDefinitions directory? Also check:
  • HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Mozilla\Firefox

Hi cor-el, Checked PolicyDefinitions, but firefox.admx and mozilla.admx are both nonexistant. I did see something within HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Mozilla, but after deleting, reinstalling Firefox with policies.json, then creating a new test profile, same issue. Any other ideas?

Tutu wotmołwu w konteksće čitać 👍 0

Wšě wotmołwy (4)

cor-el
cor-el
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

Did you look for a X:\Windows\PolicyDefinitions directory?

Also check:

  • HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Mozilla\Firefox
davwan
davwan Prašer
more options

Wubrane rozrisanje

cor-el said

Did you look for a X:\Windows\PolicyDefinitions directory? Also check:
  • HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Mozilla\Firefox

Hi cor-el, Checked PolicyDefinitions, but firefox.admx and mozilla.admx are both nonexistant. I did see something within HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Mozilla, but after deleting, reinstalling Firefox with policies.json, then creating a new test profile, same issue. Any other ideas?

davwan
davwan Prašer
more options

Figured out what's happening. Since one of our test systems was finding regkeys in HKLM\Software\Policies\Mozilla, that led me to believe while we don't have the new Firefox policy templates imported into our environment, we might have some stale GPOs pushing regkeys, since they didn't fall under the format of the new stuff.

Dug a bit, and found that someone had nested within a GPO an entry to add a handful of various registry key values into that area, causing the policies.json from working properly.

Thanks for the help, cor-el!

cor-el
cor-el
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

You're welcome and glad to read you found what was wrong.