Funkcionalnosć tutoho sydła so přez wothladowanske dźěła wobmjezuje, kotrež maja waše dožiwjenje polěpšić. Jeli nastawk waš problem njerozrisuje a chceće prašenje stajić, wobroćće so na naše zhromodźenstwo pomocy, kotrež na to čaka, wam na @FirefoxSupport na Twitter a /r/firefox na Reddit pomhać.

Pomoc přepytać

Hladajće so wobšudstwa pomocy. Njenamołwimy was ženje, telefonowe čisło zawołać, SMS pósłać abo wosobinske informacije přeradźić. Prošu zdźělće podhladnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužiwanje zdźělić“.

Dalše informacije

Firefox Ports Outbound: 50000 - 65535

  • 1 wotmołwa
  • 1 ma tutón problem
  • 12 napohladow
  • Poslednja wotmołwa wot cor-el

more options

Why does Firefox use dynamic ports in the 50K+ range when I use it to browse the web?

I have included screen shots with netstat -AB as well as currports.

Furthermore, if I set a rule in Windows Firewall blocking outbound traffic on ports 50000 - 65535, it breaks DNS with Firefox, even though 53 UDP is open.

I'm not overly concerned with any connection that is localhost / 127.0.0.1.

I've tried prohibiting these ports by modifying user.js - No impact, only works if I implicitly call out the port (example.com:55000)

What do? Why is FF using these ports?

Why does Firefox use dynamic ports in the 50K+ range when I use it to browse the web? I have included screen shots with netstat -AB as well as currports. Furthermore, if I set a rule in Windows Firewall blocking outbound traffic on ports 50000 - 65535, it breaks DNS with Firefox, even though 53 UDP is open. I'm not overly concerned with any connection that is localhost / 127.0.0.1. I've tried prohibiting these ports by modifying user.js - No impact, only works if I implicitly call out the port (example.com:55000) What do? Why is FF using these ports?
Připowěsnjene fota wobrazowki

Wšě wotmołwy (1)

more options