Funkcionalnosć tutoho sydła so přez wothladowanske dźěła wobmjezuje, kotrež maja waše dožiwjenje polěpšić. Jeli nastawk waš problem njerozrisuje a chceće prašenje stajić, wobroćće so na naše zhromodźenstwo pomocy, kotrež na to čaka, wam na @FirefoxSupport na Twitter a /r/firefox na Reddit pomhać.

Avatar for Username

Pomoc přepytać

Hladajće so wobšudstwa pomocy. Njenamołwimy was ženje, telefonowe čisło zawołać, SMS pósłać abo wosobinske informacije přeradźić. Prošu zdźělće podhladnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužiwanje zdźělić“.

Dalše informacije

Tuta nitka je so archiwowała. Prošu stajće nowe prašenje, jeli pomoc trjebaće.

Supernova (115.2.2) the CPU - related to calendar

  • 4 wotmołwy
  • 1 ma tutón problem
  • 2 napohladaj
  • Poslednja wotmołwa wot selfsimilar01

selfsimilar01
selfsimilar01
more options

Until I updated to Supernova (115.2.2) the CPU usage was low but since the update there is a high usage on a Lenovo Win 10 PC that is up to date.

It seems it is related to the calendar. If the calendar is not brought into focus immediately after starting SuperNova the CPU usage is up around 14%. Once the calendar is brought into focus and I go back to any inbox the CPU usage drops to less than 1%

Until I updated to Supernova (115.2.2) the CPU usage was low but since the update there is a high usage on a Lenovo Win 10 PC that is up to date. It seems it is related to the calendar. If the calendar is not brought into focus immediately after starting SuperNova the CPU usage is up around 14%. Once the calendar is brought into focus and I go back to any inbox the CPU usage drops to less than 1%

Wšě wotmołwy (4)

Wayne Mery
Wayne Mery
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

Let us know how 115.2.3 is later this week.

selfsimilar01
selfsimilar01 Prašer
more options

On closer examination - it looks like this problem is not completely solved. In the task manager After Supernova opens and settles down there is 10-14% CPU utilization until the calendar is brought into focus then it drops down to < 1%

Wot selfsimilar01 změnjeny

selfsimilar01
selfsimilar01 Prašer
more options

Does anyone read these questions??

selfsimilar01
selfsimilar01 Prašer
more options

Problem described above still exists in 115.3.2