Az oldal korlátolt funkcionalitással fog rendelkezni, amíg elvégezzük a felhasználói élményt javító karbantartást. Ha egy leírás nem oldja meg a problémáját, és kérdést tenne fel, akkor a támogatási közösségünk a @FirefoxSupport Twitter oldalon tud segíteni, vagy az /r/firefox oldalon a Redditen.

Támogatás keresése

Kerülje el a támogatási csalásokat. Sosem kérjük arra, hogy hívjon fel egy telefonszámot vagy osszon meg személyes információkat. Jelentse a gyanús tevékenységeket a „Visszaélés bejelentése” lehetőséggel.

További tudnivalók

A témacsoportot lezárták és archiválták. Tegyen fel új kérdést, ha segítségre van szüksége.

Issues since FF 64 Beta13

  • 5 válasz
  • 1 embernek van ilyen problémája
  • 8 megtekintés
  • Utolsó üzenet ettől: TyDraniu

more options

Hey, since FF 64 B13 there are some changes which broke our APP but I cannot find a solution. When we log into our internal website, we are immediately logged out again as soon as I click a link there. You can see that after loading the page, a control cookie "CmdCookie" is reset to an initial value so that you are directed to the login page. All other cookies remain unchanged. With FF64 Beta 12 everything worked without any problems. Does anyone know where the problem could be? If I turn off all the chaches then I can log in, but sporadically I keep being kicked out.

Thanks in advance and have a nice day! Max

Hey, since FF 64 B13 there are some changes which broke our APP but I cannot find a solution. When we log into our internal website, we are immediately logged out again as soon as I click a link there. You can see that after loading the page, a control cookie "CmdCookie" is reset to an initial value so that you are directed to the login page. All other cookies remain unchanged. With FF64 Beta 12 everything worked without any problems. Does anyone know where the problem could be? If I turn off all the chaches then I can log in, but sporadically I keep being kicked out. Thanks in advance and have a nice day! Max

Összes válasz (5)

more options

There's not much changes between these versions, I can't say what would be the cause of this issue.

https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/pushloghtml?fromchange=FIREFOX_64_0b12_RELEASE&tochange=FIREFOX_64_0b13_RELEASE

more options

I was wrong, it must be one of the following changes https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/pushloghtml?fromchange=FIREFOX_64_0b11_RELEASE&tochange=FIREFOX_64_0b12_RELEASE

Do you have any ideas how I can localize the error?

more options

Bug 1503696 looks suspicious.

If you could run MozRegression, it would point to a problematic commit. With that knowledge you could file a new bug on bugzilla.

more options

I just used mozregression with the following command: mozregression --build-type shippable --find-fix --good 2018-11-15 --bad 2018-11-17

I can see, that nighly build 2018-11-15 is OK and 2018-11-16 contains the issue but I get the info:

2:23.47 INFO: Got as far as we can go bisecting nightlies...
2:23.47 INFO: Last good revision: 0051c8d339a969d80b66e6ce243091a9dbb6a319 (2018-11-15)
2:23.47 INFO: First bad revision: 7154eb3601f3b89ef5b8e559c9f2bae57f6d59f3 (2018-11-16)
2:23.47 INFO: Pushlog:

https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=0051c8d339a969d80b66e6ce243091a9dbb6a319&tochange=7154eb3601f3b89ef5b8e559c9f2bae57f6d59f3

2:23.47 INFO: Switching bisection method to taskcluster
2:23.48 INFO: Getting mozilla-central builds between 0051c8d339a969d80b66e6ce243091a9dbb6a319 and 7154eb3601f3b89ef5b8e559c9f2bae57f6d59f3
2:39.60 INFO: There are no build artifacts for these changesets (they are probably too old).

When I compare https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=0051c8d339a969d80b66e6ce243091a9dbb6a319&tochange=7154eb3601f3b89ef5b8e559c9f2bae57f6d59f3 with https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/pushloghtml?fromchange=FIREFOX_64_0b11_RELEASE&tochange=FIREFOX_64_0b12_RELEASE

I can see that Bug 1503696 is included in both lists. Am I correct to download the sources from Firefox 64 beta 12 and remove the changes from the bug and recompile it? Then should I be able to test it?

more options

You could be able to test it, but there's no need to download sources etc. The only change in this bug (except tests) is inside the FaviconLoader.jsm, which is compressed within the omni.ja file. Try to open this omni.ja with 7-zip, edit the FaviconLoader.jsm and save it back, it should be enough to test it.