This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Cari Bantuan

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Pelajari Lebih Lanjut

Utas ini telah diarsipkan. Silakan membuat pertanyaan baru jika Anda membutuhkan bantuan.

Incorrect numbering of nested lists in Thunderbird 78.7.1 (32 bits)

  • 2 balas
  • 1 memiliki masalah ini
  • 1 kunjungan
  • Balasan terakhir oleh Toad-Hall

Michael
Michael
more options

When writing an email containing numbered nested lists, the numbering at the higher levels is incorrect. Hereby attached is the simples example of this problem.

The last one should be numbered "2", but no, it is 3. I just use the menus of Thunderbird in order to build the list.

How can I have the numbering work correctly?

Thanks, Michael

When writing an email containing numbered nested lists, the numbering at the higher levels is incorrect. Hereby attached is the simples example of this problem. The last one should be numbered "2", but no, it is 3. I just use the menus of Thunderbird in order to build the list. How can I have the numbering work correctly? Thanks, Michael
Lampiran tangkapan layar

Semua Balasan (2)

Michael
Michael Pemilik pertanyaan
more options

Note: I had posted this same bug earlier, no reaction from anyone whatsoever...

Toad-Hall
Toad-Hall
  • Top 25 Contributor
more options

Yes it is a known bug. I reported it ages ago. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1636766

This is related to this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1548753

Basically, it is all linked up to that bug in Firefox as there is a sharing of some code. So I believe we are now waiting to see what occurs when that code is brought across to Thunderbird which sounds like version 82 - if I read the info correctly.