Join the Mozilla’s Test Days event from Dec 2–8 to test the new Firefox address bar on Firefox Beta 134 and get a chance to win Mozilla swag vouchers! 🎁

This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Why does the new Quantum take so long to type and pullup a wedsite?

  • 3
  • 3
  • 16 views
  • Nzaghachi ikpeazụ nke TX713

more options

I got the update for the new Quantum browser and it is terribly slow. It delays the type, it delays when I click to open a new window, and is very slow to open a site. Any ideas?

I got the update for the new Quantum browser and it is terribly slow. It delays the type, it delays when I click to open a new window, and is very slow to open a site. Any ideas?

Asịsa ahọpụtara

i've received some info via pm.

please see if this fixes the problem for you: go to the firefox menu ≡ > options > privacy & security panel and under permissions check the setting to prevent accessibility services from accessing your browser.

Gụọ azịza a na nghọta 👍 1

All Replies (3)

more options

hi, could you go to the firefox menu ≡ > help ? > troubleshooting information, copy the contents of that page and paste them here into a reply on the forum (or if it's to long through a site like https://pastebin.mozilla.org/ and provide the link here)?

this might give us a clue what is going on. thank you!

more options

Asịsa Ahọpụtara

i've received some info via pm.

please see if this fixes the problem for you: go to the firefox menu ≡ > options > privacy & security panel and under permissions check the setting to prevent accessibility services from accessing your browser.

more options

That seems to solve the problem, thank you.