This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Browsers should SLOW DOWN their release cycle and release Secure debugged software

  • 1 nzaghachinzaghachi
  • 0
  • Nzaghachi ikpeazụ nke Victor

more options

I think browsers should slow down their release cycle and release secure and debugged software. Take the time to fuzz, use static and dynamic security checkers. Maybe a release every 3 months. I am tired of re-imaging and switching between browsers to escape hackers.

I think browsers should slow down their release cycle and release secure and debugged software. Take the time to fuzz, use static and dynamic security checkers. Maybe a release every 3 months. I am tired of re-imaging and switching between browsers to escape hackers.

All Replies (1)

more options

There are only 3 things that interact with the network on my Fedora system: chronyd (clock sync), system-resolvd (DNS) and the Browser. I have disabled chronyd; my system is new and clock battery is good. And I have an infallible security detector: my USB Ethernet adapter with traffic indicator. If I see a prolonged stream of traffic of a minute or two, when I have not clicked on a link, a page, or load a web site, then it could mean only 2 things: that the dns resolver is being hacked or it is the browser. DNS resolver is reputed to be pretty hard to hack. And browsers has security fixes with EVERY version. What would you guess is the culprit attack vector?

I use firejail with the x11 setting enabled. So there is a buffer against key-loggers and screen grabbers. And the x11 buffer is virtual, starts up like new on every restart of the browser. So I should be reasonably safe (I guess). But that does not excuse any vulnerabilities in the browser.

I cannot prove the attack with a PoC, I am not a white hat vulnerability researcher, just an ordinary admin. But I do hold a Security+ cert. Granted the attack may involve other pieces. But the browser is the most likely entry point. And that should not happen. Somebody should hold the browser vendor accountable. There is no un-hackable software, true, but they have to prove their due diligence has been done, and post code audit results with every release.

Helpful?

Jụọ ajụjụ

You must log in to your account to reply to posts. Please start a new question, if you do not have an account yet.