Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Questo sito potrebbe offrire funzionalità limitate durante le operazioni di manutenzione per migliorare l'esperienza utente. Se un articolo non risolve il tuo problema e vuoi richiedere supporto, la nostra comunità di supporto è pronta ad aiutarti tramite @FirefoxSupport su Twitter e /r/firefox su Reddit.

Cerca nel supporto

Attenzione alle mail truffa. Mozilla non chiederà mai di chiamare o mandare messaggi a un numero di telefono o di inviare dati personali. Segnalare qualsiasi attività sospetta utilizzando l'opzione “Segnala abuso”.

Ulteriori informazioni

Questa discussione è archiviata. Inserire una nuova richiesta se occorre aiuto.

Theme Wrongly Blocked by reviewver

more options

A moderator named tiny has this to say about my theme:

"Hello,


Your add-on, Green 1.0, has been reviewed and did not meet the criteria for being hosted in our gallery.

Reviewer: tiny

Comments: Spam content" I made that with firefox color

'''A moderator named tiny has this to say about my theme:''' ''"Hello, Your add-on, Green 1.0, has been reviewed and did not meet the criteria for being hosted in our gallery. Reviewer: tiny Comments: Spam content" '' I made that with firefox color

Tutte le risposte (6)

more options

Add-on questions should be posted in the add-ons forum; https://discourse.mozilla-community.org/c/add-ons

more options

OK Ive posted it there

more options

Good luck.

Hello,

I am glad to hear that your problem has been resolved. If you haven't already, please select the answer that solves the problem. This will help other users with similar problems find the solution.

Thank you for contacting Mozilla Support.

more options

I notice that you participate(d) in a Nimbus study to investigate for issues when Firefox changes from 99.0 to 100.0. So you can keep an eye on this if you encounter issues due to your user agent.

  • User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:100.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/100.0
more options

So you can keep an eye on this if you encounter issues due to your user agent.

This is certainly English, but I can't understand that

more options

Firefox User said

cor-el said

I notice that you participate(d) in a Nimbus study to investigate for issues when Firefox changes from 99.0 to 100.0.

So you can keep an eye on this if you encounter issues due to your user agent.

  • User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:100.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/100.0
So you can keep an eye on this if you encounter issues due to your user agent.

This is certainly English, but I can't understand that

It's just this:

When Firefox requests pages, it sends a self-identification known as the user agent string. For example:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:93.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/93.0

Some websites may reject your request based on the version number in that string, saying it is obsolete by their standards.

If you notice any strange objections to your Firefox version, this experimental version 100.0 user agent string could be the explanation.