当サイトはユーザー体験を改善するためのメンテナンスを実施中に機能が制限される予定です。記事を読んでもあなたの問題が解決せず質問をしたい場合は、Twitter の @FirefoxSupport、Reddit の /r/firefox で、サポートコミュニティが皆さんを助けようと待機しています。

Avatar for Username

Mozilla サポートの検索

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

詳しく学ぶ

このスレッドはアーカイブに保管されました。 必要であれば新たに質問してください。

Why does enabling DNS over HTTPS (DoH) cause Firefox to prefer IPv4?

  • 2 件の返信
  • 1 人がこの問題に困っています
  • 4 回表示
  • 最後の返信者: Jason R. Coombs

Jason R. Coombs
Jason R. Coombs
more options

I've enabled DoH by setting the `network.trr.mode` value to `2`. After restarting, I notice that websites are defaulting to IPv4. For example, browsing to http://kame.net shows a static turtle and not the animated one. Switching the mode back to `0` and restarting, the site resolves to IPv6. I tried enabling `network.trr.early-AAAA` in the hopes that would restore a preference for IPv6, but no luck.

Is there a way to enable DoH without degrading the default IP stack to IPv4?

I've enabled DoH by setting the `network.trr.mode` value to `2`. After restarting, I notice that websites are defaulting to IPv4. For example, browsing to http://kame.net shows a static turtle and not the animated one. Switching the mode back to `0` and restarting, the site resolves to IPv6. I tried enabling `network.trr.early-AAAA` in the hopes that would restore a preference for IPv6, but no luck. Is there a way to enable DoH without degrading the default IP stack to IPv4?

すべての返信 (2)

Paul
Paul
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

Hi

If you change the network.trr.mode to 3 it should force DoH regardless of site.

Jason R. Coombs
Jason R. Coombs 質問者
more options

Hi Seburo. I don't see how that suggestion at all addresses my concern. My issue is that when enabling DoH, it seems that the preference for IPv6 is lost and IPv4 is preferred, despite the behavior being different with DoH disabled.

I did try your suggestion to use mode 3, but at least in my current environment, it fails to resolve the addresses at all (possibly due to corporate restrictions).