Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

当サイトはユーザー体験を改善するためのメンテナンスを実施中に機能が制限される予定です。記事を読んでもあなたの問題が解決せず質問をしたい場合は、Twitter の @FirefoxSupport、Reddit の /r/firefox で、サポートコミュニティが皆さんを助けようと待機しています。

Mozilla サポートの検索

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

詳しく学ぶ

このスレッドはアーカイブに保管されました。 必要であれば新たに質問してください。

accessing local swf file

more options

I have an odd problem that doesn't seem to be addressed. I have a web site that uses a combination of js and swf files to load and display thumbnails which then uses flash to resize them and flash player to display them. With the latest flash player and Firefox update, everything works fine when live. It also works fine when opened locally in IE8 and Chrome. However, these files won't load locally in Firefox since the updates, although they work fine when live.

Rolling back flash player might work, but I hesitate since everything is working except for this one thing

I have an odd problem that doesn't seem to be addressed. I have a web site that uses a combination of js and swf files to load and display thumbnails which then uses flash to resize them and flash player to display them. With the latest flash player and Firefox update, everything works fine when live. It also works fine when opened locally in IE8 and Chrome. However, these files won't load locally in Firefox since the updates, although they work fine when live. Rolling back flash player might work, but I hesitate since everything is working except for this one thing

すべての返信 (6)

more options

Are you using the file:// protocol or http://localhost/ ?

What was the last version of Firefox in which this worked? It's possible that some security-related changes were made in the interim.

more options

How are you accessing your website? Directly by double clicking HTML files it should work fine. If you try to connect locally by directly typing the address on your web server or on a computer on the same network, you may have NAT problems. Type the IP address of your server instead of the hostname.

Finally make sure you link to the SWF file with relative paths.

more options

See also:

more options

Just to clarify..the problem occurs only in the flash section of the page. It will not load this section.

I'm using file://protocol and have no problems with anything else. I don't know the number of the firefox version, but this only occurred with the latest update. I allowed both flash and firefox updates at the same time.

I use relative paths which work everywhere else and open the html in the browser locally by either clicking the html file or File>Open File>Page Source

Flash trusted locations is one of the first things I did. Works fine for all other browsers.

I'm wondering if there is some connection to the new protected mode. Flash site says they are not supporting WindowXP with this, but it also says it will allow old security rules if on trusted location. Totally baffled.

The only other possibility I can think of is the coding. I have some problem there that I haven't addressed yet. But in saying that, it does work when live, so that doesn't seem overly likely.

more options

Then I think the source of the issue is located on your Flash plug-in. With all the respect and merits to Adobe, I think Flash is the worst and most used plug-in ever created. It works bad, but many websites use it. It is very unstable and heavy for most computers...

more options

I suspect it's a security restriction applicable to local files. For example, relative paths to parent or sibling folders may fail under the file:// protocol. You might or might not see an error in Firefox's Error Console (Ctrl_Shift+j).

Could you install a web server and use http://localhost/? Windows XP Pro includes IIS, or if it's more similar to your real hosting environment, you could get a "WAMP" package.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_WAMPs