본 사이트는 여러분의 사용자 경험을 개선하기 위해 유지 보수를 진행하는 동안 기능이 제한됩니다. 도움말로 문제가 해결되지 않고 질문을 하고 싶다면 Twitter의 @FirefoxSupport 및 Reddit의 /r/firefox 채널을 활용하세요.

Mozilla 도움말 검색

고객 지원 사기를 피하세요. 저희는 여러분께 절대로 전화를 걸거나 문자를 보내거나 개인 정보를 공유하도록 요청하지 않습니다. "악용 사례 신고"옵션을 사용하여 의심스러운 활동을 신고해 주세요.

자세히 살펴보기

Why has Thuderbird stopped sorting emails by date and added a new sorting method of its own?

  • 4 답장
  • 5 이 문제를 만남
  • 220 보기
  • 최종 답변자: howardthomas

more options

Yesterday my emails were sorted in strict date order. Today they're sorted by subject and date, and are in reverse date order - oldest first. So all the emails I've received from someone in the past two months are grouped together, earliest first. I can't imagine what use that method can be to anyone.

When I click on the Date header nothing changes.

Yesterday my emails were sorted in strict date order. Today they're sorted by subject and date, and are in reverse date order - oldest first. So all the emails I've received from someone in the past two months are grouped together, earliest first. I can't imagine what use that method can be to anyone. When I click on the Date header nothing changes.

선택된 해결법

Sounds like you might have threaded sort turned on. View-Sort By-Unthreaded

문맥에 따라 이 답변을 읽어주세요 👍 3

모든 댓글 (4)

more options

Click on "Date" to sort by date. Click again to sort in reverse order.

Or in the menu, View|Sort by will give you further options.

No menu? Press the <alt> button on your keyboard.

more options

Thanks, Zenos, but nothing has changed. Each time I get a reply from a person I'm corresponding with, every email I've ever sent him moves up the list of emails in to the most recent spot, and sorts itself in reverse order (i.e. earliest first, latest last). It's extremely annoying and I can't see any reason for it to be happening.

more options

선택된 해결법

Sounds like you might have threaded sort turned on. View-Sort By-Unthreaded

more options

Thanks, that solved the problem. I've never been to that View menu before so I wonder how it could have become turned on. But thanks again.