본 사이트는 여러분의 사용자 경험을 개선하기 위해 유지 보수를 진행하는 동안 기능이 제한됩니다. 도움말로 문제가 해결되지 않고 질문을 하고 싶다면 Twitter의 @FirefoxSupport 및 Reddit의 /r/firefox 채널을 활용하세요.

Mozilla 도움말 검색

고객 지원 사기를 피하세요. 저희는 여러분께 절대로 전화를 걸거나 문자를 보내거나 개인 정보를 공유하도록 요청하지 않습니다. "악용 사례 신고"옵션을 사용하여 의심스러운 활동을 신고해 주세요.

자세히 살펴보기

Firefox on CentOS 7 thinks Firefox on CentOS 6 is old or not compatible.

  • 5 답장
  • 1 이 문제를 만남
  • 59 보기
  • 최종 답변자: bobcatos

more options

I have a dual-boot workstation with CentOS 6 and CentOS 7. Both installations have the same version of Firefox, v68.2.0esr and both systems are fully updated. When I boot CentOS 7 after running CentOS 6, Firefox insists on making a new profile because it thinks it can't use the old profile. That requires me to sync, customise, set preferences, et cetera. That's a PITA.

I have a dual-boot workstation with CentOS 6 and CentOS 7. Both installations have the same version of Firefox, v68.2.0esr and both systems are fully updated. When I boot CentOS 7 after running CentOS 6, Firefox insists on making a new profile because it thinks it can't use the old profile. That requires me to sync, customise, set preferences, et cetera. That's a PITA.

선택된 해결법

You can compare the compatibility.ini file in a profile used with Firefox on both OSs to see in what way they differ.

문맥에 따라 이 답변을 읽어주세요 👍 0

모든 댓글 (5)

more options

Firefox stores the installation path of the Firefox version that last used this profile as a hash in profiles.ini and in installs.ini as a backup, so if you start Firefox in another OS then the path doesn't match and Firefox does complain.

See also:

more options

That was an interesting link and I think I understood some of it. But does it still make sense when the CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 installations are exactly the same version? Furthermore, why does it insist on a new profile only when going from C6 to C7 and not the other way? If all that still makes sense to you, I guess my bottom line is what kind of hackery can I perform to keep the C7 instance from demanding a new profile? FWIW, the currently used profile (on C6 at the moment) is vhaajjg6.default-default-2.

more options

선택된 해결법

You can compare the compatibility.ini file in a profile used with Firefox on both OSs to see in what way they differ.

more options

I have now booted CentOS 7 and built a new profile for firefox (lyt9l8r1.default-default-3). Here is the compatibility file from CentOS 6: [Compatibility] LastVersion=68.2.0_20191101125725/20191101125725 LastOSABI=Linux_x86_64-gcc3 LastPlatformDir=/usr/lib64/firefox LastAppDir=/usr/lib64/firefox/browser

And from CentOS 7: LastVersion=68.2.0_20191023183522/20191023183522 LastOSABI=Linux_x86_64-gcc3 LastPlatformDir=/usr/lib64/firefox LastAppDir=/usr/lib64/firefox/browser

And the diff: < LastVersion=68.2.0_20191101125725/20191101125725 --- > LastVersion=68.2.0_20191023183522/20191023183522

more options

Okay, I think I've identified a bug. I booted back to CentOS 6 and sure enough, FF uses the same profile that C7 FF created, but stuck its own version/buildID into the LastVersion param of the compatibility.ini file. So I booted back to C7, and hacked the compatibility.ini file for that profile to change the LastVersion param to that of the C7 FF. Then FF started up without carps. So I take that to mean that the version comparison logic in the profile selection process is broken. I'm guessing it's comparing the whole version/buildID string and not just the version part. Thanks for giving me the clues to run that down.