This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Why did you spent time for integration of Pocket and not in solving the "Logjam"-vulberability?

  • 2 replies
  • 1 has this problem
  • 1 view
  • Paskiausią atsakymą parašė cor-el

more options

Why was the logjam-problem not solved? I think it's more impotant than the pocket-integration.

Why was the logjam-problem not solved? I think it's more impotant than the pocket-integration.

Chosen solution

You can also toggle the involved prefs to false on the about:config page.

  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_128_sha
  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_256_sha

You can open the about:config page via the location/address bar. You can accept the warning and click "I'll be careful" to continue.

Skaityti atsakymą kartu su kontekstu 👍 0

All Replies (2)

more options

hi thairis, mozilla cannot "solve" the logjam vulnerability since this is a vulnerability in the configuration of web-servers (that their respective owners, admins would have to fix). all a browser can do (and firefox 39 will do) is to disallow users from accessing insecure servers and displaying an error message instead. until then you can use this mozilla-provided addon: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/disable-dhe/

more options

Chosen Solution

You can also toggle the involved prefs to false on the about:config page.

  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_128_sha
  • security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_aes_256_sha

You can open the about:config page via the location/address bar. You can accept the warning and click "I'll be careful" to continue.