This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Natao arisiva ity resaka mitohy ity. Mametraha fanontaniana azafady raha mila fanampiana.

Firefox 36.0 and 36.0.1 are very slow to either let me bookmark a page or to access my bookmarks.

  • 11 valiny
  • 3 manana an'ity olana ity
  • 1 view
  • Valiny farany nomen'i Robt27

more options

If I use Firefox 35.0.1 Firefox is pretty speedy (as it usually is) to bookmark or let me see my bookmarks, but with 36.0 and 36.0.1 it takes about five seconds for Firefox to respond. This happens whether I have my add-ons disabled or not, and whether I use my regular profile or create a new one with the ProfileSwitcher add-on.

If I use Firefox 35.0.1 Firefox is pretty speedy (as it usually is) to bookmark or let me see my bookmarks, but with 36.0 and 36.0.1 it takes about five seconds for Firefox to respond. This happens whether I have my add-ons disabled or not, and whether I use my regular profile or create a new one with the ProfileSwitcher add-on.

All Replies (11)

more options

hey Robt27

I would try a clean slate to see if that speeds things up:

https://www.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/new/?utm_source=firefox-com&utm_medium=referral

Good luck Brad

more options
more options

I have about 13,000 bookmarks. I'm wondering if with Firefox 36.0 and 36.0.1 bookmarks are handled differently internally in the browser to where if a person just has a modest number of bookmarks no difference in bookmarking speed or in speed of accessing bookmarks is evident, but if a person has a very large number a big difference in bookmarking speed is noticeable.

more options

I tried updating to Firefox 37.0b3, but that didn't help. I uninstalled and went back to 35.0.1 which works just fine. Speedy bookmarking of web pages and speedy access to bookmarks manager.

more options

I ran the Places Maintenance add-on set to "All" with no improvement. I also rebuilt the Places database per the instructions on this page http://kb.mozillazine.org/Bookmarks_history_and_toolbar_button... and that did not help.

Thanks for your attempt at helping me, cor-el. Thanks to you as well, Bradforth.

more options

Did you check this in a clean profile without any extensions installed with only the bookmarks restored?

Create a new profile as a test to check if your current profile is causing the problem.

See "Creating a profile":

If the new profile works then you can transfer files from a previously used profile to the new profile, but be cautious not to copy corrupted files to avoid carrying over problems.

more options

I created a new profile with only the bookmarks restored. That did not help. What I did to solve my problem was to archive my bookmarks and then create a new profile with all my customizations, but not the bookmarks. At least this way if I need to I can access my old bookmarks in a profile created only for that purpose.

more options

Robt27 said

JUST TRY AGAIN..............!!!
more options

I plan to try it again very soon. I'm guessing that the file which contains my bookmarks (13,000) is pretty messed up.

more options

I did try it again and still no success. I think my bookmarks file is too corrupted to be salvageable.

more options

It still seems odd to me that Firefox 35.0.1 could handle my 13,000 bookmarks easily, but Firefox 36.0 and 36.0.1 can't. There probably is some corruption in my large, old bookmarks file, but the sudden change in Firefox's performance makes me think that it was a change in the way the browser handles bookmarks that caused the problem.

Also, I have to wonder if once I accumulate a large number of bookmarks will the newer versions of Firefox not be able to handle that either? Was bookmarking handling-ability sacrificed to achieve some other performance objective with Firefox? For me, bookmarking handling-ability is one of the main reasons I use Firefox.