This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Natao arisiva ity resaka mitohy ity. Mametraha fanontaniana azafady raha mila fanampiana.

FF mobile useragent all the same

  • 1 valiny
  • 23 manana an'ity olana ity
  • 10 views
  • Valiny farany nomen'i Matt Brubeck

darkshadow16
darkshadow16
more options

The useragent of all firefox mobile users is the same. A couple of different devices all got the useragent: Mozilla/5.0 (Android; Linux armv7l; rv:2.1) Gecko/20110318 Firefox/4.0b13pre Fennec/4.0

The problem is that there is no device information in the UA so from the UA it's not possible to know what device is browsing your website. The WURFL project: http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/ is based on UA so mobile devices get other stylesheets on pages than desktop browsers. Without device information and android version in the UA firefox mobile is not easy to use.

The useragent of all firefox mobile users is the same. A couple of different devices all got the useragent: Mozilla/5.0 (Android; Linux armv7l; rv:2.1) Gecko/20110318 Firefox/4.0b13pre Fennec/4.0 The problem is that there is no device information in the UA so from the UA it's not possible to know what device is browsing your website. The WURFL project: http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/ is based on UA so mobile devices get other stylesheets on pages than desktop browsers. Without device information and android version in the UA firefox mobile is not easy to use.

All Replies (1)

Matt Brubeck
Matt Brubeck
more options

Thanks for the feedback. For discussion of this issue, please see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625238