This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Thread ini telah diarkib. Sila tanya soalan baru jika anda perlu bantuan.

How to change filelink style in outgoing email?

  • 5 balasan
  • 5 ada masalah ini
  • 10 paparan
  • Balasan terakhir oleh mozillawebid

mozillawebid
mozillawebid
more options

I use filelink feature of Thunderbird a lot for attaching big files. However, when ever I use filelinks Thunderbird puts a big html block with link to the attachment as seen in this screenshot: http://imgur.com/XexKeLK . Initialy, it looks good and fancy but very soon it becomes very distracting, annoying and confusing to recipient. Few times people also confuse it with advertisement! Also, while using filelink, thunderbird would attach a file of 0 bytes with names like "Part1.2". So my question is:

1. Is there any way to simplify the html block generated by filelink feature? Just a plain link with may be file size is good enough, atleast for me. I have tried editing the source HTML of outgoing email myself but it is not a solution as it has to be done for each and every email.

2. Can Thunderbird not attach 0 byte files while using filelink? It is also a source of confusion to recipient.

Thanks

I use filelink feature of Thunderbird a lot for attaching big files. However, when ever I use filelinks Thunderbird puts a big html block with link to the attachment as seen in this screenshot: http://imgur.com/XexKeLK . Initialy, it looks good and fancy but very soon it becomes very distracting, annoying and confusing to recipient. Few times people also confuse it with advertisement! Also, while using filelink, thunderbird would attach a file of 0 bytes with names like "Part1.2". So my question is: 1. Is there any way to simplify the html block generated by filelink feature? Just a plain link with may be file size is good enough, atleast for me. I have tried editing the source HTML of outgoing email myself but it is not a solution as it has to be done for each and every email. 2. Can Thunderbird not attach 0 byte files while using filelink? It is also a source of confusion to recipient. Thanks

Diubah oleh mozillawebid

Penyelesaian terpilih

As suggested by christ1, switching to plain text email resolves Issue 1 and it seems to work with all filelink providers.

Issue 2 is not resolved by above workaround. However, I will still mark this question as resolved as first issue was the most annoying to me. Thanks.

Baca jawapan ini dalam konteks 👍 2

All Replies (5)

christ1
christ1
  • Top 25 Contributor
more options

This is how attachments look for me using Filelink in connection with Dropbox. I'm composing in plain text.

I've linked 2 files to this email:

  • image1.jpg (2.4 MB) hosted on Dropbox: <url>
  • image2.jpg (2.6 MB) hosted on Dropbox: <url>

You may try this add-on to install Dropbox as a Filelink provider.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/dropbox-for-filelink/

mozillawebid
mozillawebid Pemilik Soalan
more options

Switching to plain text email resolves Issue 1. It works for all providers, not just dropbox.

Any idea about issue 2 in my question?

christ1
christ1
  • Top 25 Contributor
more options

Try Dropbox as provider for Filelink.

mozillawebid
mozillawebid Pemilik Soalan
more options

No. Dropbox as provider did not resolve issue 2. See attached screenshots.

Diubah oleh mozillawebid

mozillawebid
mozillawebid Pemilik Soalan
more options

Penyelesaian Terpilih

As suggested by christ1, switching to plain text email resolves Issue 1 and it seems to work with all filelink providers.

Issue 2 is not resolved by above workaround. However, I will still mark this question as resolved as first issue was the most annoying to me. Thanks.