Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

"Content-Type" header code execution

more options

We are looking to find a fix for the code execution bug found in May of 2021:

Mozilla Firefox is vulnerable to code execution by a remote attacker who can convince a user to open a malicious file. By manipulating the "Content-Type" header of a file the attacker can cause Firefox to execute scripts concealed in files that appear to be of non-executable types.

We are looking to find a fix for the code execution bug found in May of 2021: Mozilla Firefox is vulnerable to code execution by a remote attacker who can convince a user to open a malicious file. By manipulating the "Content-Type" header of a file the attacker can cause Firefox to execute scripts concealed in files that appear to be of non-executable types.

Chosen solution

If you use my test document you will see that Firefox 96 still works the same way: when the server indicates this combination:

Content-Type: text/html Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=test.jpg

Firefox corrects the file name during the save process from test.jpg to test.jpg.html and you can open it as an HTML page rather than a corrupt JPEG image.

I don't know whether anyone has filed a bug. Normally security researchers would have done that before making a public disclosure but it is hard to search for security bugs.

If you want to file a new bug:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/

Read this answer in context 👍 0

All Replies (5)

more options

Can you link to information about that vulnerability? To prevent a delay in your post appearing, add a space before the .com or .org in your link. (Otherwise, the reply is sent to the link spam moderation queue.)

more options
more options

I think this is what they're doing:

https://www.jeffersonscher.com/res/test_jpg.php

Adding screenshot of download dialog:

Modified by jscher2000 - Support Volunteer

more options

That was the site I saw about this issue but no official notice or fix which is what is needed.

more options

Chosen Solution

If you use my test document you will see that Firefox 96 still works the same way: when the server indicates this combination:

Content-Type: text/html Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=test.jpg

Firefox corrects the file name during the save process from test.jpg to test.jpg.html and you can open it as an HTML page rather than a corrupt JPEG image.

I don't know whether anyone has filed a bug. Normally security researchers would have done that before making a public disclosure but it is hard to search for security bugs.

If you want to file a new bug:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/