Vanwege onderhoudswerkzaamheden die uw ervaring zouden moeten verbeteren, heeft deze website beperkte functionaliteit. Als een artikel uw probleem niet verhelpt en u een vraag wilt stellen, kan onze ondersteuningsgemeenschap u helpen in @FirefoxSupport op Twitter en /r/firefox op Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Zoeken in Support

Vermijd ondersteuningsscams. We zullen u nooit vragen een telefoonnummer te bellen, er een sms naar te sturen of persoonlijke gegevens te delen. Meld verdachte activiteit met de optie ‘Misbruik melden’.

Meer info

Deze conversatie is gearchiveerd. Stel een nieuwe vraag als u hulp nodig hebt.

Problem with local installation of signed XPI

  • 6 antwoorden
  • 2 hebben dit probleem
  • 1 weergave
  • Laatste antwoord van jfix

jfix
jfix
more options

Hello, I have created an extension and signed it with this command (on a Mac):

$ jpm sign --api-key [apikey] --api-secret [apisecret]

It is unlisted on AMO, but the XPI itself is available here:

https://github.com/jfix/adestra-extensions/releases/download/v3.0.1/oecddirect-3.0.1-fx.xpi

Within our organisation we would like to install this extension on users' computers (all Windows 7). We've been looking at the official documentation here:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Archive/Mozilla/Adding_extensions_using_the_Windows_registry https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/Installing_extensions https://mike.kaply.com/2012/02/09/integrating-add-ons-into-firefox/

However, whatever we tried, the extension is disabled (see attached screenshot). We tried to change the `xpinstall.signatures.required` to `false` which enabled it but still said something about the extension not being verified.

The Firefox version used is 45. Windows 7.

Hello, I have created an extension and signed it with this command (on a Mac): $ jpm sign --api-key [apikey] --api-secret [apisecret] It is unlisted on AMO, but the XPI itself is available here: https://github.com/jfix/adestra-extensions/releases/download/v3.0.1/oecddirect-3.0.1-fx.xpi Within our organisation we would like to install this extension on users' computers (all Windows 7). We've been looking at the official documentation here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Archive/Mozilla/Adding_extensions_using_the_Windows_registry https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/Installing_extensions https://mike.kaply.com/2012/02/09/integrating-add-ons-into-firefox/ However, whatever we tried, the extension is disabled (see attached screenshot). We tried to change the `xpinstall.signatures.required` to `false` which enabled it but still said something about the extension not being verified. The Firefox version used is 45. Windows 7.
Gekoppelde schermafbeeldingen

Alle antwoorden (6)

cor-el
cor-el
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

Try to ask advice at the Add-ons forum website.

jscher2000 - Support Volunteer
jscher2000 - Support Volunteer
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

I'm pretty sure Firefox wants the extension to be signed by the Mozilla Add-ons team's private key.

cor-el
cor-el
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

Locally installed extensions probably only work properly if they had a full review and have SIGNEDSTATE_SIGNED (2). You can find the state in the extensions.json file. 

SIGNEDSTATE_MISSING: 0 - Add-on is unsigned
SIGNEDSTATE_PRELIMINARY: 1 - Add-on is preliminarily reviewed
SIGNEDSTATE_SIGNED: 2 - Add-on is fully reviewed
SIGNEDSTATE_SYSTEM: 3 - Add-on is system add-on
jfix
jfix Vraageigenaar
more options

Thanks @jscher2000 and @cor-el for your replies. I take it, looking at them, that the signing process I used (jpm sign --api-key [...] --api-secret [...]) is not sufficient. Looking at the extensions's listing, it is only "preliminarily reviewed". I didn't know I needed more.

Now, obviously, my next question: How can I get a "full review" in order to move up to signedstate 2?

Thank again so far!

Bewerkt door jfix op

the-edmeister
the-edmeister
  • Moderator
more options

See - https://discourse.mozilla-community.org/c/add-ons

jfix
jfix Vraageigenaar
more options

For reference, I have opened a thread, as suggested, here: https://discourse.mozilla-community.org/t/how-to-request-a-in-depth-review-of-my-addon/8332