Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Vanwege onderhoudswerkzaamheden die uw ervaring zouden moeten verbeteren, heeft deze website beperkte functionaliteit. Als een artikel uw probleem niet verhelpt en u een vraag wilt stellen, kan onze ondersteuningsgemeenschap u helpen in @FirefoxSupport op Twitter en /r/firefox op Reddit.

Zoeken in Support

Vermijd ondersteuningsscams. We zullen u nooit vragen een telefoonnummer te bellen, er een sms naar te sturen of persoonlijke gegevens te delen. Meld verdachte activiteit met de optie ‘Misbruik melden’.

Meer info

Deze conversatie is gearchiveerd. Stel een nieuwe vraag als u hulp nodig hebt.

bookmark performance

  • 7 antwoorden
  • 2 hebben dit probleem
  • 9 weergaven
  • Laatste antwoord van glfirex

more options

Hello,

I've almost 6000 bookmark on Firefox and the file where they are stored ( places.sqlite ) in the directory profile is over ten megabyte in size.

Does a lot of bookmark slow down Firefox ? If I delete all bookmarks, can I see a performance boost ?

Thank you.

Marco Usai

Hello, I've almost 6000 bookmark on Firefox and the file where they are stored ( places.sqlite ) in the directory profile is over ten megabyte in size. Does a lot of bookmark slow down Firefox ? If I delete all bookmarks, can I see a performance boost ? Thank you. Marco Usai

Alle antwoorden (7)

more options

hi, the places.sqlite database (which also stores your history) grows in steps of 10MB - so you're still at its initial level. i don't think that clearing your bookmarks would give you a noticeable performance boost at this stage.

Bewerkt door philipp op

more options

Hi.

The places.sqlite file stores bookmarks and history, so the total amount of there determine the size of the file. When necessary then places.sqlite is enlarged with an extra 10 MB chunks like posted above, this file only gets smaller when you VACUUM the file (e.g. via Help -> Troubleshooting Information or Places Maintenance). Firefox needs to check if the link you visit is a bookmark or history and thus a large amount of items stored in places.sqlite can slow down opening a link since the visit count and other data may have to be updated.

Are you experiencing delays when you open a link?

Note that this can have other causes like an extension.

more options

In the last few days I've noticed that sometimes FF was slow and lagging when scrolling pages and switching tabs, so I've investigated the bookmark aspect.

I've installed Adblock Plus and FireShot extensions only.

Probably the latest version of FF or one of the plug-in above has some problems that will be fixed with a new version.

I've no delays opening links.

more options

in case you have adblock plus version 2.9 - there are currently a number of reports that this recent update causes poor performance, please try to replace it with https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/ and see if the issue is still there.

more options

philipp said

in case you have adblock plus version 2.9 - there are currently a number of reports that this recent update causes poor performance, please try to replace it with https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/ and see if the issue is still there.

Yes, I've Adblock Plus version 2.9.

I'm going to make some test to see if I solve.

more options

I've just removed Adblock Plus and installed u-Block: the first impression is a noticeable faster page load, but I need more time to speak about FF slow and lagging when scrolling pages and switching tabs.

Even though in the past I've read many positive reviews about u-Block Origin, I've always chosen Adblock Plus based on the plug-in installed base: 17.521.021 users vs 3.975.431.

more options

It seems that the overall speed of the browser is much better with u-Block Origin, also the problem of FF slow and lagging when scrolling pages and switching tabs seems gone.