Vanwege onderhoudswerkzaamheden die uw ervaring zouden moeten verbeteren, heeft deze website beperkte functionaliteit. Als een artikel uw probleem niet verhelpt en u een vraag wilt stellen, kan onze ondersteuningsgemeenschap u helpen in @FirefoxSupport op Twitter en /r/firefox op Reddit.

Zoeken in Support

Vermijd ondersteuningsscams. We zullen u nooit vragen een telefoonnummer te bellen, er een sms naar te sturen of persoonlijke gegevens te delen. Meld verdachte activiteit met de optie ‘Misbruik melden’.

Meer info

Support ECH or ESNI in 128.2.0esr

  • 1 antwoord
  • 0 hebben dit probleem
  • 9 weergaven
  • Laatste antwoord van Valentin

more options

Hello,

I installed Firefox 128.2.0esr. I set the next parameters in GPO for settings DNSOverHTTPS: "DNSOverHTTPS": {

                      "Enabled":  true,

"ProviderURL": "https://safe.dot.dns.yandex.net/dns-query", "Locked": true, "Fallback": true }. But when checking via https://www.cloudflare.com/ru-ru/ssl/encrypted-sni/#results I get (screenshot in attachment). As you can see from the screenshot, DNS and SNI did not receive the coveted check marks. Secure DNS We weren’t able to detect whether you were using a DNS resolver over secure transport. Contact your DNS provider or try using 1.1.1.1 for fast & secure DNS. DNSSEC Attackers cannot trick you into visiting a fake website by manipulating DNS responses for domains that are outside their control. TLS 1.3 Nobody snooping on the wire can see the certificate of the website you made a TLS connection to. Secure SNI Anybody listening on the wire can see the exact website you made a TLS connection to.

In my browser / about:config: network.trr.mode = 2 network.trr.uri = https://safe.dot.dns.yandex.net/dns-query

In 128.2.0esr there is no protection against ESNI interceptions and ECH is enabled by default? Or is the problem that the DNS provider does not support the technology from Mozilla? Or what other settings we need use (via GPO)?

Thank you.

Hello, I installed Firefox 128.2.0esr. I set the next parameters in GPO for settings DNSOverHTTPS: "DNSOverHTTPS": { "Enabled": true, "ProviderURL": "https://safe.dot.dns.yandex.net/dns-query", "Locked": true, "Fallback": true }. But when checking via https://www.cloudflare.com/ru-ru/ssl/encrypted-sni/#results I get (screenshot in attachment). As you can see from the screenshot, DNS and SNI did not receive the coveted check marks. '''Secure DNS''' We weren’t able to detect whether you were using a DNS resolver over secure transport. Contact your DNS provider or try using 1.1.1.1 for fast & secure DNS. '''DNSSEC''' Attackers cannot trick you into visiting a fake website by manipulating DNS responses for domains that are outside their control. '''TLS 1.3''' Nobody snooping on the wire can see the certificate of the website you made a TLS connection to. '''Secure SNI''' Anybody listening on the wire can see the exact website you made a TLS connection to. In my browser / about:config: network.trr.mode = 2 network.trr.uri = https://safe.dot.dns.yandex.net/dns-query In 128.2.0esr there is no protection against ESNI interceptions and ECH is enabled by default? Or is the problem that the DNS provider does not support the technology from Mozilla? Or what other settings we need use (via GPO)? Thank you.
Gekoppelde schermafbeeldingen

Bewerkt door NoahSUMO op

Alle antwoorden (1)

more options

> Secure DNS We weren’t able to detect whether you were using a DNS resolver over secure transport. Contact your DNS provider or try using 1.1.1.1 for fast & secure DNS.

That just means you aren't using cloudflare's own DNS resolver over an encrypted connection. I get the same when using https://dns.google/dns-query as the DoH provider. The problem is that cloudflare can't know whether the connection between you and the recursive resolver is encrypted or not. I think this is expected behaviour.

> Anybody listening on the wire can see the exact website you made a TLS connection to.

It seems https://safe.dot.dns.yandex.net/dns-query doesn't return the correct ECH configs. Try using a different provider maybe?

Behulpzaam?

Een vraag stellen

U moet zich aanmelden bij uw account om op berichten te antwoorden. Stel een nieuwe vraag als u nog geen account hebt.