Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Este site está com funcionalidades limitadas enquanto realizamos manutenção para melhorar sua experiência de uso. Se nenhum artigo resolver seu problema e você quiser fazer uma pergunta, nossa comunidade de suporte pode te ajudar em @FirefoxSupport no Twitter e /r/firefox no Reddit.

Pesquisar no site de suporte

Evite golpes de suporte. Nunca pedimos que você ligue ou envie uma mensagem de texto para um número de telefone, ou compartilhe informações pessoais. Denuncie atividades suspeitas usando a opção “Denunciar abuso”.

Saiba mais

Esta discussão foi arquivada. Faça uma nova pergunta se precisa de ajuda.

Improper handling of RFC5987 HTTP parameters such as filename

  • 1 resposta
  • 1 tem este problema
  • 1 exibição
  • Última resposta de pfriend

more options

I have files on my website whose names are in UTF-8 and contain characters outside the ASCII set. I am setting the Content-Disposition header as an attachment with a filename* parameter encoded per RFC5987. The non-ascii characters are translated fine, but there appears to be a problem handling space encoding (%20). Per this RFC spaces in the filename are encoded as %20, but when I download the file these encoded space characters are being converted to + characters which is incorrect. This appears to be a bug in Firefox (Chrome as well I might add).

I have files on my website whose names are in UTF-8 and contain characters outside the ASCII set. I am setting the Content-Disposition header as an attachment with a filename* parameter encoded per RFC5987. The non-ascii characters are translated fine, but there appears to be a problem handling space encoding (%20). Per this RFC spaces in the filename are encoded as %20, but when I download the file these encoded space characters are being converted to + characters which is incorrect. This appears to be a bug in Firefox (Chrome as well I might add).

Solução escolhida

Ignore this one. Turns out there was a unicode conversion bug that was causing this, Firefox is all good. :-)

Ler esta resposta 👍 0

Todas as respostas (1)

more options

Solução escolhida

Ignore this one. Turns out there was a unicode conversion bug that was causing this, Firefox is all good. :-)

Alterado por pfriend em