Este site irá ter funcionalidade limitada enquanto fazemos manutenção para melhorar a sua experiência. Se um artigo não resolve o seu problema e quiser colocar uma questão, temos a nossa comunidade de apoio à espera de o ajudar em @FirefoxSupport no Twitter, /r/firefox no Reddit.

Pesquisar no apoio

Evite burlas no apoio. Nunca iremos solicitar que telefone ou envie uma mensagem de texto para um número de telefone ou que partilhe informações pessoais. Por favor, reporte atividades suspeitas utilizando a opção "Reportar abuso".

Saber mais

filter (?) on number of recipients?

  • 7 respostas
  • 3 têm este problema
  • 1 visualização
  • Última resposta por JeanneR

more options

This is prompted by my being part of a group that generating too much e-mail and, especially, mis-using REPLY ALL.

So I'd like to be able to filter on the number of recipients (either TO or CC). I'd like to give priority to e-mail that is addressed only to me and possibly one or two others. But these are not specific people. I want to give priority to e-mail from anybody if it is addressed only to me. And I want to ignore mail that has too many recipients even if one or two of them are very important people.

Even if I filter on members names, it still doesn't give me a count (I think). Is there a way to do this? Or is there some clever trick outside the filtering function that I'm not thinking of?

Desperate! Thanks for any ideas.

This is prompted by my being part of a group that generating too much e-mail and, especially, mis-using REPLY ALL. So I'd like to be able to filter on the number of recipients (either TO or CC). I'd like to give priority to e-mail that is addressed only to me and possibly one or two others. But these are not specific people. I want to give priority to e-mail from anybody if it is addressed only to me. And I want to ignore mail that has too many recipients even if one or two of them are very important people. Even if I filter on members names, it still doesn't give me a count (I think). Is there a way to do this? Or is there some clever trick outside the filtering function that I'm not thinking of? Desperate! Thanks for any ideas.

Solução escolhida

Sorry, the link was wrong, but I corrected it. Please try again…

Ler esta resposta no contexto 👍 1

Todas as respostas (7)

more options

Well, maybe not ignore. Maybe mark low priority. I don't want to be mean. ;-)

more options

The only way I can think of is creating a filter on the To: or Cc: header and specifying a pattern with a number of commas, like *,*,*. Then you can change the priority with the filter action or move the message to a specific folder.

more options

That is fascinating. Have you made this work? I never saw the use of wildcards in filters, but I'm game. I set up a filter for TO or CC -- *,*,*,* to move to another folder. I couldn't get it to run manually. But I actually control enough e-mail addresses that I could test it running auto. It did not. Thunderbird skipped over those messages and moved them elsewhere depending on filters lower on the list. I tried adding quotation marks and re-ran on the same messages, but some just moved according to filters even lower on the list.

This will be so great if I can make it work. You've got me so excited. Pleeeeeze... can you think of anything else I need to do?

more options

Looks like out of the box you cannot filter on expressions, so you are stuck at filtering on To (or CC) contains a comma, but that probably selects too many messages.

Try the FiltaQuilla add-on, then you can do a regexp match on any header line…

Modificado por Onno Ekker a

more options

Your link took me to a domain registrar (I think). I'm extremely interested in the add-on. Can you supply a link?

Thanks.

more options

Solução escolhida

Sorry, the link was wrong, but I corrected it. Please try again…

more options

I'm back to thank you. The documentation for FiltaQuilla is so abysmal that I needed to find some time to figure it out. Trying to cope with it for several nights running when I needed sleep just led nowhere.

But I finally did get a little time to focus on it in the daytime and I got it working. Very useful.

So many many thanks, Jeanne