This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Caută ajutor

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Află mai multe

Acest fir de discuție a fost arhivat. Adresează o întrebare nouă dacă ai nevoie de ajutor.

symbol not supported by firefox or where will i find symbol font

  • 3 răspunsuri
  • 1 are această problemă
  • 4 vizualizări
  • Ultimul răspuns de cor-el

more options

WHEN I USE BULLET LIST IN FIREFOX USING DEVEXPRESS RICH EDITOR FONT-FAMILY SYMBOL BULLET SHOWING VERY SMALL

WHEN I USE BULLET LIST IN FIREFOX USING DEVEXPRESS RICH EDITOR FONT-FAMILY SYMBOL BULLET SHOWING VERY SMALL

Toate răspunsurile (3)

more options

You shouldn't use the Symbol font, but use the Unicode version of such a character.

It is best to always use the Unicode representation of characters to avoid font problems, because in that case any font that supports those symbols can be used. It works on all platforms if you have a font installed that covers this Unicode range.

more options

You can generate a bulleted list in HTML using the Unordered List (<ul>) element. Then Firefox will take care of the symbol for you, matching the size of the bullet to the accompanying text.

https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTML/Element/ul

Does the DevExpress editor generate standard HTML unordered lists or does it do something else? If it generates standard HTML, perhaps there is a problem with the style rules inserted by the tool.

more options

Can you attach a screenshot?

  • use a compressed image type like PNG or JPG to save the screenshot
  • make sure you do not exceed the maximum size of 1 MB

Can you post a link to a publicly accessible page (i.e. no authentication or signing on required) or post the code that you used?