Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Spletno mesto bo delovalo z omejenimi zmožnostmi, medtem ko na njem izvajamo vzdrževalna dela za vas. Če članki ne rešijo vaše težave in želite zastaviti vprašanje, naša skupnost za podporo čaka na vas na @FirefoxSupport na Twitterju in na /r/firefox na Redditu.

Avatar for Username

Iskanje po podpori

Izogibajte se prevarantski tehnični podpori. Nikoli vam ne bomo naročili, da pokličete telefonsko številko ali nam pošljete osebne podatke. Sumljivo dejavnost prijavite z gumbom »Prijavi zlorabo«.

Več o tem

Ta tema je arhivirana. Postavite prosim novo vprašanje, če potrebujete pomoč.

Have all the hash values been included in hash table for Firefox v46.0?

  • 1 odgovor
  • 1 ima to težavo
  • 7 ogledov
  • Zadnji odgovor od philipp

yelsker
yelsker
more options

First, thanks for all the work so many of you do to produce Firefox. It's a terrific application and we've been using it for years. It's far and away our first choice for browsers- excellent job!

So my question is this: Have all the hash values been included in the table: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/SHA512SUMS ?

Having computed the SHA512 hash for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/win64/en-US/Firefox Setup 46.0.exe reveals no matching hash in the above-mentioned table, although computing a hash for, as an example for:

https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/mac/en-US/Firefox 46.0.dmg DOES find a corresponding match in the table.

For comparison, I checked the raw size of: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.2/ -> File SHA512SUMS 517K 12-Apr-2016 14:08

and for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/ -> File SHA512SUMS 186K 26-Apr-2016 21:18 so there seems to be a large discrepancy in the file sizes.

If there are missing hash values in the v46.0 hash table, could that table be updated to include the missing values so that the user community can properly verify the correct download of the v46.0 files?

Thanks again for all the work the community does!

First, thanks for all the work so many of you do to produce Firefox. It's a terrific application and we've been using it for years. It's far and away our first choice for browsers- excellent job! So my question is this: Have all the hash values been included in the table: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/SHA512SUMS ? Having computed the SHA512 hash for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/win64/en-US/Firefox Setup 46.0.exe reveals no matching hash in the above-mentioned table, although computing a hash for, as an example for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/mac/en-US/Firefox 46.0.dmg DOES find a corresponding match in the table. For comparison, I checked the raw size of: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.2/ -> File SHA512SUMS 517K 12-Apr-2016 14:08 and for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/ -> File SHA512SUMS 186K 26-Apr-2016 21:18 so there seems to be a large discrepancy in the file sizes. If there are missing hash values in the v46.0 hash table, could that table be updated to include the missing values so that the user community can properly verify the correct download of the v46.0 files? Thanks again for all the work the community does!

Vsi odgovori (1)

philipp
philipp
  • Moderator
more options

hi yelsker, please refer to https://rail.merail.ca/posts/firefox-460-and-sha512sums.html